Skip to content

Conversation

@deivid-rodriguez
Copy link
Contributor

Description:

Restores gem query command and sets removal date to next year, since we never actually released the deprecation, as per #3104 (comment).

Tasks:

  • Describe the problem / feature
  • Write tests
  • Write code to solve the problem
  • Get code review from coworkers / friends

I will abide by the code of conduct.

@hsbt
Copy link
Member

hsbt commented Feb 3, 2020

@bundlerbot merge

ghost pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Feb 3, 2020
3119: Restore gem query r=hsbt a=deivid-rodriguez

# Description:

Restores `gem query` command and sets removal date to next year, since we never actually released the deprecation, as per #3104 (comment).

# Tasks:

- [x] Describe the problem / feature
- [ ] Write tests
- [x] Write code to solve the problem
- [ ] Get code review from coworkers / friends

I will abide by the [code of conduct](https://github.com/rubygems/rubygems/blob/master/CODE_OF_CONDUCT.md).


Co-authored-by: David Rodríguez <deivid.rodriguez@riseup.net>
@ghost
Copy link

ghost commented Feb 3, 2020

Build succeeded

  • ubuntu (2.6.x, rubygems)
  • macos (2.6.x)
  • ubuntu_lint
  • ubuntu_bundler_master (2.6.x)
  • install (2.3.8)
  • ruby_master
  • macos (2.4.x)
  • install (2.6.5)
  • ubuntu_rvm (jruby-9.2.9.0)
  • install (2.5.7)
  • ubuntu_rvm (ruby-head)
  • ubuntu (2.4.x, rubygems)
  • windows (2.4.x)
  • ubuntu (2.5.x, bundler)
  • ubuntu (2.5.x, rubygems)
  • install (jruby-9.2.9.0)
  • ubuntu (2.4.x, bundler)
  • macos (2.5.x)
  • install (2.4.9)
  • ubuntu_rvm (2.3.8)
  • windows (2.5.x)
  • ubuntu (2.6.x, bundler)
  • windows (2.6.x)

@ghost ghost merged commit 0b6e349 into master Feb 3, 2020
@ghost ghost deleted the restore_gem_query branch February 3, 2020 01:17
@bronzdoc
Copy link
Contributor

bronzdoc commented Feb 3, 2020

@deivid-rodriguez thank you

matzbot pushed a commit to ruby/ruby that referenced this pull request Feb 6, 2020
This pull request was closed.
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants