Fix clippy multiple_bound_location warnings#528
Merged
bors merged 3 commits intorust-lang:masterfrom May 30, 2024
Merged
Conversation
Because otherwise those impls are too long for one line
Member
|
Thanks! @bors r+ |
Contributor
Contributor
Contributor
|
☀️ Test successful - checks-actions |
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
3 participants
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
This PR moves the
?Sizedgenerics bound used in the map and set source files from the generics predicate to the where clause, if a where clause already exists.According to what I could find online that
?Sizedbound had to be there until rustc 1.15, but since?Sizedis already specified in where clauses in these files I don't think thats an issue.I always put the
?Sizedbound last, because that is where it already appears in the docs, but if?Sizedfirst is preferred, I'll change that.This PR also changes the
Debugimpls for *EntryRef to use a where clause, because they currently have a linebreak in "impl X for Y" line.If this last change isn't wanted or considered something separate, please let me know :)