intrinsic_raw query optimization attempt #2

[azhogin]

intrinsic_raw query works like inlined function for non-incremental build and non-local DefId.
In continue of #147232 (couldn't reopen original closed PR).

Optimization may be profitable for queries with low normalized average execution time (to replace cache lookup into inlined call) and be significant with good cache_hits.

Query	cache_hits	min_ns	max_ns	avg_ns_norm
source_span	11361	18	2991	66
hir_owner_parent	5773	52	1773	163
is_doc_hidden	3134	47	1111	285
lookup_deprecation_entry	13905	36	6208	287
object_lifetime_default	5840	63	4688	290
upvars_mentioned	2575	75	7722	322
*intrinsic_raw*	21235	73	3453	367

Draft PR to measure performance changes.

[azhogin]

r? @petrochenkov

[petrochenkov]

@bors2 try @rust-timer queue

[rust-bors]

☀️ Try build successful (CI)
Build commit: 1450ec5 (1450ec5278c285a3eb1b789f156b8d7b1cf83b48, parent: acf243778e6c54cb7d54bee4be88e510e4be123e)

[rust-timer]

Finished benchmarking commit (1450ec5): comparison URL.

Overall result: ❌✅ regressions and improvements - no action needed

Benchmarking this pull request means it may be perf-sensitive – we'll automatically label it not fit for rolling up. You can override this, but we strongly advise not to, due to possible changes in compiler perf.

@bors rollup=never
@rustbot label: -S-waiting-on-perf -perf-regression

Instruction count

Our most reliable metric. Used to determine the overall result above. However, even this metric can be noisy.

	mean	range	count
Regressions ❌ (primary)	0.3%	[0.3%, 0.3%]	1
Regressions ❌ (secondary)	1.1%	[1.1%, 1.1%]	1
Improvements ✅ (primary)	-	-	0
Improvements ✅ (secondary)	-0.2%	[-0.4%, -0.2%]	4
All ❌✅ (primary)	0.3%	[0.3%, 0.3%]	1

Max RSS (memory usage)

This benchmark run did not return any relevant results for this metric.

Cycles

Results (secondary 2.7%)

A less reliable metric. May be of interest, but not used to determine the overall result above.

	mean	range	count
Regressions ❌ (primary)	-	-	0
Regressions ❌ (secondary)	3.2%	[2.1%, 4.4%]	9
Improvements ✅ (primary)	-	-	0
Improvements ✅ (secondary)	-2.3%	[-2.3%, -2.3%]	1
All ❌✅ (primary)	-	-	0

Binary size

This benchmark run did not return any relevant results for this metric.

Bootstrap: 471.876s -> 475.183s (0.70%)
Artifact size: 388.40 MiB -> 388.40 MiB (0.00%)

[petrochenkov]

The difference is also within the noise.
(coercions is a noisy benchmark in particular.)