Skip to content

Fix std doctest build for SGX target.#153774

Merged
rust-bors[bot] merged 1 commit intorust-lang:mainfrom
sardok:fix_sgx_std_doctest_build
Mar 14, 2026
Merged

Fix std doctest build for SGX target.#153774
rust-bors[bot] merged 1 commit intorust-lang:mainfrom
sardok:fix_sgx_std_doctest_build

Conversation

@sardok
Copy link
Contributor

@sardok sardok commented Mar 12, 2026

This PR fixes standard library doctest build for x86_64-fortanix-unknown-sgx target.

@rustbot rustbot added S-waiting-on-review Status: Awaiting review from the assignee but also interested parties. T-libs Relevant to the library team, which will review and decide on the PR/issue. labels Mar 12, 2026
@rustbot
Copy link
Collaborator

rustbot commented Mar 12, 2026

r? @Mark-Simulacrum

rustbot has assigned @Mark-Simulacrum.
They will have a look at your PR within the next two weeks and either review your PR or reassign to another reviewer.

Use r? to explicitly pick a reviewer

Why was this reviewer chosen?

The reviewer was selected based on:

  • Owners of files modified in this PR: @ChrisDenton, libs
  • @ChrisDenton, libs expanded to 8 candidates

@rust-log-analyzer

This comment has been minimized.

@sardok sardok force-pushed the fix_sgx_std_doctest_build branch from 981fd95 to 8459d6b Compare March 12, 2026 14:49
@WaffleLapkin
Copy link
Member

@bors r+ rollup

@rust-bors
Copy link
Contributor

rust-bors bot commented Mar 13, 2026

📌 Commit 8459d6b has been approved by WaffleLapkin

It is now in the queue for this repository.

@rust-bors rust-bors bot added S-waiting-on-bors Status: Waiting on bors to run and complete tests. Bors will change the label on completion. and removed S-waiting-on-review Status: Awaiting review from the assignee but also interested parties. labels Mar 13, 2026
matthiaskrgr added a commit to matthiaskrgr/rust that referenced this pull request Mar 13, 2026
…r=WaffleLapkin

Fix std doctest build for SGX target.

This PR fixes standard library doctest build for `x86_64-fortanix-unknown-sgx` target.
rust-bors bot pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Mar 14, 2026
Rollup of 4 pull requests

Successful merges:

 - #153376 (Replace `visit_waiters` with `abstracted_waiters_of`)
 - #153818 (Reimplement const closures)
 - #153774 (Fix std doctest build for SGX target.)
 - #153786 (Remove `value_from_cycle_error` specializations)
rust-bors bot pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Mar 14, 2026
Rollup of 7 pull requests

Successful merges:

 - #152621 (LinkedGraph: support adding nodes and edges in arbitrary order)
 - #153376 (Replace `visit_waiters` with `abstracted_waiters_of`)
 - #153760 (Move and expand the big `rustc_query_impl` macro into a physical `query_impl.rs`)
 - #153818 (Reimplement const closures)
 - #153774 (Fix std doctest build for SGX target.)
 - #153786 (Remove `value_from_cycle_error` specializations)
 - #153819 (delete some duplicated tests)
rust-bors bot pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Mar 14, 2026
Rollup of 7 pull requests

Successful merges:

 - #152621 (LinkedGraph: support adding nodes and edges in arbitrary order)
 - #153376 (Replace `visit_waiters` with `abstracted_waiters_of`)
 - #153760 (Move and expand the big `rustc_query_impl` macro into a physical `query_impl.rs`)
 - #153818 (Reimplement const closures)
 - #153774 (Fix std doctest build for SGX target.)
 - #153786 (Remove `value_from_cycle_error` specializations)
 - #153819 (delete some duplicated tests)
@rust-bors rust-bors bot merged commit 4b35702 into rust-lang:main Mar 14, 2026
11 checks passed
@rustbot rustbot added this to the 1.96.0 milestone Mar 14, 2026
@sardok sardok deleted the fix_sgx_std_doctest_build branch March 16, 2026 10:34
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

S-waiting-on-bors Status: Waiting on bors to run and complete tests. Bors will change the label on completion. T-libs Relevant to the library team, which will review and decide on the PR/issue.

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

5 participants