Remove broken explicit coercion example #30113
Merged
+0
−7
Conversation
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Contributor
|
(rust_highfive has picked a reviewer for you, use r? to override) |
Contributor
|
@bors: r+ rollup |
Collaborator
|
📌 Commit 4a63d9f has been approved by |
Contributor
|
Yeah, I missed this too 😓 |
Collaborator
bors
added a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Nov 30, 2015
Sorry, thanks to @Ms2ger for pointing this out in #30088 (comment)
steveklabnik
added a commit
to steveklabnik/rust
that referenced
this pull request
Nov 30, 2015
In rust-lang#29932, I moved the location of TRPL, but I missed making the changes in mk/tests.mk. This led to rust-lang#30088 landing with a broken example. As such, rust-lang#30113 will need to land before this.
Collaborator
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
5 participants
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Sorry, thanks to @Ms2ger for pointing this out in #30088 (comment)