Skip to content

Conversation

@tdaede
Copy link
Contributor

@tdaede tdaede commented Apr 11, 2013

Without 'file' it assumes a 32 bit userspace even with a 64 bit kernel, which is incorrect in most cases.

@catamorphism
Copy link
Contributor

I'm not sure if it matters anymore with our new build automation, can you re-submit this with incoming as the target branch? Thanks!

bors added a commit that referenced this pull request Apr 12, 2013
Without 'file' it assumes a 32 bit userspace even with a 64 bit kernel, which is incorrect in most cases.
@catamorphism
Copy link
Contributor

Actually, don't bother doing that; I think the build automation bot will do the right thing. Thanks!

@bors bors closed this Apr 12, 2013
flip1995 added a commit to flip1995/rust that referenced this pull request Aug 11, 2020
needless_collect: catch x: Vec<_> = iter.collect(); x.into_iter() ...

changelog: Expand the needless_collect lint as suggested in rust-lang#5627 (WIP).

This PR is WIP because I can't figure out how to make the multi-part suggestion include its changes in the source code (the fixed is identical to the source, despite the lint making suggestions). Aside from that one issue, I think this should be good.
flip1995 pushed a commit to flip1995/rust that referenced this pull request Aug 11, 2020
Rollup of 5 pull requests

Successful merges:

 - rust-lang#5837 (needless_collect: catch x: Vec<_> = iter.collect(); x.into_iter() ...)
 - rust-lang#5846 (Handle mapping to Option in `map_flatten` lint)
 - rust-lang#5848 (Add derive_ord_xor_partial_ord lint)
 - rust-lang#5852 (Add lint for duplicate methods of trait bounds)
 - rust-lang#5856 (Remove old Symbol reexport)

Failed merges:

r? @ghost

changelog: rollup
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants