Skip to content

Add web-presence-team repository under automation#1273

Closed
Kobzol wants to merge 1 commit intorust-lang:masterfrom
Kobzol:repo-web-presence-team
Closed

Add web-presence-team repository under automation#1273
Kobzol wants to merge 1 commit intorust-lang:masterfrom
Kobzol:repo-web-presence-team

Conversation

@Kobzol
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

@Kobzol Kobzol commented Jan 22, 2024

Repo: https://github.com/rust-lang/web-presence-team

Extracted from GH:

org = "rust-lang"
name = "web-presence-team"
description = "Home of the Web Presence Team"
bots = []

[access.teams]
security = "pull"

[access.individuals]
badboy = "admin"
rylev = "admin"
jdno = "admin"
pietroalbini = "admin"
Mark-Simulacrum = "admin"
rust-lang-owner = "admin"

@Kobzol
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member Author

Kobzol commented Jan 23, 2024

The web-presence team doesn't even exist on GH, and the repo is 4 years old and has one commit. So I'm not sure if it's worth it to even create the team, or perhaps outright remove the repo?

@rylev
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

rylev commented Jan 23, 2024

It seems like there is only one thing that would be lost be deleting the repo: rust-lang/web-presence-team#1

Perhaps we can somehow archive that PR in some form?

@Kobzol
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member Author

Kobzol commented Jan 23, 2024

Oh, I didn't notice that PR. Ok, in that case I would say "let's archive the whole repo" (in the future, once we're in the archiving phase, after the migration phase 😆 ).

@rylev
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

rylev commented Mar 19, 2024

@Kobzol should we update this to archive the repo?

@Kobzol
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member Author

Kobzol commented Mar 19, 2024

Actually, this should be closed, since this repo is already included in #1390.

@Kobzol Kobzol closed this Mar 19, 2024
@Kobzol Kobzol deleted the repo-web-presence-team branch March 19, 2024 09:07
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants