Use intel-mkl-system feature to calc coverage#322
Merged
Conversation
356899c to
c07ce6a
Compare
Member
Author
|
Container update is done in #323. This PR try to fix coverage job |
c07ce6a to
3c184eb
Compare
Codecov Report
@@ Coverage Diff @@
## master #322 +/- ##
==========================================
- Coverage 90.71% 89.90% -0.81%
==========================================
Files 71 71
Lines 3726 3756 +30
==========================================
- Hits 3380 3377 -3
- Misses 346 379 +33
📣 We’re building smart automated test selection to slash your CI/CD build times. Learn more |
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Use new container-> #323Coverage job on master fails with link error
https://github.com/rust-ndarray/ndarray-linalg/runs/8094527572?check_suite_focus=true
This occurs with
intel-mkl-staticfeature. This PR tries to useintel-mkl-systemfeature instead.