Skip to content

Conversation

@nardoor
Copy link
Contributor

@nardoor nardoor commented Aug 31, 2024

This is an experimentation branch.
The way I duplicated code to """quickly""" have an async impl is a terrible way to do it.
To me full code duplication is never a good option.

My goal is to reach a state of rustic/rustic_core/rustic_backend to experiment on the async implementations.

This might be a step towards a long term architectural change that could solve issues like rustic-rs/rustic#1181 and possibly enhance performances? (yet to be measured^^)


Do you find interesting that I keep on going with this experimentation?

This is an experimentation branch.
The way I duplicated code to """quickly""" have an async impl
is a terrible way to do it.
Full code duplication is never a good option.

My goal is to reach a state of rustic/rustic_core/rustic_backend
to experiment on the async implementations.
@simonsan simonsan marked this pull request as draft September 30, 2024 16:51
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant