Skip to content

Improve Tools section (mainly based on Dr. Smith's feedback) #191

@samm82

Description

@samm82

Again, this will be a place for gathering my thoughts and next steps for tweaking this section based on #149:

  • Ensure this chapter is consistent with the Terminology section without duplicating info
  • Don't use links as identifying labels for something; instead, describe what is being pointed to with the pointer in parentheses for traceability
  • Determine how to structure "explicitness" (from Thesis Meeting | June 9, 2024 - 2pm - Teams #192):
    We define/discuss explicitness in its own subsection in our Terminology section. I was thinking about doing this here as well, but I think it may be better to interleave it throughout our discussion, since it comes up throughout (such as in our graph examples). I currently outline how we detect "implicit" information in general at the beginning, is this logical?

Sub-issues

Metadata

Metadata

Assignees

Labels

enhancementNew feature or requestreviewRequest for (or response to) review

Projects

Status

Done

Milestone

No milestone

Relationships

None yet

Development

No branches or pull requests

Issue actions