Compiler incorrectly treats string literals with some characters

[MatiDragon-YT]

In the past I remembered that the IDE compiled the strings, but eliminating the spaces, and now it does not compile them directly. So you asked me. Wasn't it better to replace the spaces with another character? It was there when I started to investigate the archive .SCM, and I noticed that the spaces were replaced by the underscores when decompiling. So, could the same function be done for compilation of the scripts, and thus avoid this problem?

GXT.addDynamic("EXA", "Hello Word")

--------- ⬇ when compiling ---------

0ADF: "EXA" "Hello_Word"

--------- ⬇ when decompiling-------

GXT.addDynamic("EXA", "Hello_Word")

and another thing ... since the F11 does not have any function in the editor, other than deleting the field of the Opcodes Finder. Could you assign it to open the offline help file (.chm)? yes? please...

[x87]

Compiler can't replace spaces with underscores as this changes the content and may break the logic this string is for. "Hello world" and "Hello_world" are two different string literals.

Can you provide a real code that does not compile? Spaces in string literals should not cause compilation issues.

[x87]

I see that using "extended" params in classes may cause compilation issue:

e.g. this code works

Player.SetClothes(0@,"a c","ddddd    ddd",0)

but this does not

Player.SetClothes(0@,"a c","ddddd    ddd",Torso)

Is this the same issue that you experience?

[MatiDragon-YT]

YES!!! I thought it was for something else...

[x87]

and another thing ... since the F11 does not have any function in the editor, other than deleting the field of the Opcodes Finder. Could you assign it to open the offline help file (.chm)? yes? please...

you can use User tools to achieve this:

[MatiDragon-YT]

@x87 Yes I know... after sending the proposal I had remembered that program. I configured it, I tested it, it worked, and finally, I forgot to edit the footer of the message... sorry... but there was also something else he wanted to say to you and he didn't remember it.
But... now I do remember.
You know that the new gosub function that you implemented is tasty, delicious, exquisite, capable of delighting you and making you feel an orgasm and everything, but... do you think you can do something similar with it opcode 0AB1?

AnimObj() // if this is a gosub.

AnimObjTo($obj, x, y, z) // this can be the same as 
//0AB1: call_scm_func @AnimObjTo 4 $obj x y z

😀

[x87]

do you think you can do something similar with it opcode 0AB1?

Absolutely, read my proposal here

[x87]

Related issue: compiler replaces comma in string literals with whitespace:

Player.SetClothes(0@,"a c","ddd,dd    ddd",0)

after decompilation becomes

Player.SetClothes(0@, "A C", "DDD DD DDD", 0)

[MatiDragon-YT]

But the comma(,), is already registered to be visible within the game.

How about this idea .. if 1 space is detected, compile it with the space, but if it is more than 2 spaces, compile with the underscores, and when decompiling, we replace these characters with spaces, BUT ONLY IF they have a space before, otherwise the underscores will be kept..

GXT.Create("ac20","ddd,dd  dd__ddd") // e.g. 1
Player.SetClothes(0@,"a c","ddd,dd   ddd",0) // e.g. 2

--------- ⬇ when compiling ---------

GXT.Create("ac20","ddd,dd _dd__ddd") // e.g. 1
Player.SetClothes(0@,"a c","ddd,dd __ddd",0) // e.g. 2

--------- ⬇ when decompiling-------

GXT.Create("ac20","ddd,dd  dd__ddd") // e.g. 1
Player.SetClothes(0@,"a c","ddd,dd   ddd",0) // e.g. 2