Skip to content

Use println() rather than print() #1056

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Merged
SethTisue merged 1 commit into from
May 14, 2018
Merged

Use println() rather than print() #1056

Changes from all commits
Commits
Show all changes
1 commit
Select commit
File filter

Filter by extension

Filter by extension
Conversations
Failed to load comments.
Loading
Jump to
Jump to file
Failed to load files.
Loading
Diff view
Diff view
4 changes: 2 additions & 2 deletions _tour/for-comprehensions.md
View file
Open in desktop
Original file line number Diff line number Diff line change
Expand Up @@ -42,7 +42,7 @@ def foo(n: Int, v: Int) =

foo(10, 10) foreach {
case (i, j) =>
print(s"($i, $j) ") // prints (1, 9) (2, 8) (3, 7) (4, 6) (5, 5)
println(s"($i, $j) ") // prints (1, 9) (2, 8) (3, 7) (4, 6) (5, 5)
Copy link

@MasseGuillaume MasseGuillaume Apr 25, 2018

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

the output would be

(1, 9)
(2, 8)
(3, 7)
(4, 6)
(5, 5)

Copy link
Member

@SethTisue SethTisue Apr 25, 2018

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

true, but not sure the difference is worth the vertical space

}

```
Expand All @@ -60,7 +60,7 @@ You can omit `yield` in a comprehension. In that case, comprehension will return
def foo(n: Int, v: Int) =
for (i <- 0 until n;
j <- i until n if i + j == v)
print(s"($i, $j)")
println(s"($i, $j)")

foo(10, 10)
```