Skip to content

Conversation

@odersky
Copy link
Contributor

@odersky odersky commented May 7, 2020

Also, move avoid from TypeAssigner to TypeOps, since we
need to refer to it in Types.

Based on #8867

@odersky odersky force-pushed the refactor-typeops branch from 0dde4b7 to 9e2255c Compare May 7, 2020 14:44
odersky added 2 commits May 9, 2020 20:11
Also, move `avoid` from TypeAssigner to TypeOps, since we
need to refer to it in Types.

Based on scala#8867
@odersky odersky force-pushed the refactor-typeops branch from 9e2255c to f2f082d Compare May 9, 2020 18:12
@odersky odersky requested a review from smarter May 9, 2020 18:12
@odersky
Copy link
Contributor Author

odersky commented May 9, 2020

@smarter No need to review in detail, since it's just moving around things. Just to get your agreement that we should move avoid from TypeAssigner to TypeOps.

@odersky odersky closed this May 9, 2020
@odersky odersky reopened this May 9, 2020
Copy link
Member

@smarter smarter left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

LGTM

@smarter smarter merged commit 5154641 into scala:master May 10, 2020
@smarter smarter deleted the refactor-typeops branch May 10, 2020 01:18
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants