Fix result[s]AtInLLVMSSA() #620
Merged
Conversation
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
vulder
approved these changes
May 16, 2023
Collaborator
vulder
left a comment
vulder
left a comment
There was a problem hiding this comment.
The design looks a bit over-complicated but if you want to have it as generic as possible 😉
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
The functions
resultAtInLLVMSSA()undresultsAtInLLVMSSA()in theSolverResultscrash if called with a non-void instruction that happens to be a terminator of a BasicBlock (e.g. ainvokestmt).As there seems to be no exact solution to computing the resultsAtInLLVMSSA of terminator instructions, this PR provides an approximation that works in most cases.