[sei] Governance proposal for new token pair on the dex#61
Merged
Conversation
udpatil
reviewed
Jun 27, 2022
f1ea906 to
8a9db90
Compare
codchen
approved these changes
Jun 28, 2022
Collaborator
codchen
left a comment
There was a problem hiding this comment.
maybe add an example proposal json file somewhere? either under x/dex/examples or part of this PR description is fine
fcc4edd to
7de6735
Compare
…to kartik/dex-token-pairs-governance
masih
pushed a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Sep 26, 2025
masih
pushed a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Sep 29, 2025
## Describe your changes and provide context Refactors the code a bit and add necessary helpers for Tokenfactory mint and burn message types. * They both will deposit and withdraw from module accounts as they're used as intermediaries for storage For context, module accounts are a single source of the bottom neck when it comes to concurrency, so to remove this bottle neck, we avoid declaring them in the access ops, instead, we store an in-memory value protected by mutex locks and flush it to the AVL tree at the very end. This will ensure deterministic updates Follow-up PRs, still need to test concurrency: #331 sei-protocol/sei-cosmos#63 ## Testing performed to validate your change Mainly unit tests - will need to do some E2E testing once it's integrated with the sei-chain level chains. Will follow up with two more PRs Sanity check that bank sends aren't affected with the follow up PRs: 
masih
pushed a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Sep 30, 2025
## Describe your changes and provide context Refactors the code a bit and add necessary helpers for Tokenfactory mint and burn message types. * They both will deposit and withdraw from module accounts as they're used as intermediaries for storage For context, module accounts are a single source of the bottom neck when it comes to concurrency, so to remove this bottle neck, we avoid declaring them in the access ops, instead, we store an in-memory value protected by mutex locks and flush it to the AVL tree at the very end. This will ensure deterministic updates Follow-up PRs, still need to test concurrency: #331 sei-protocol/sei-cosmos#63 ## Testing performed to validate your change Mainly unit tests - will need to do some E2E testing once it's integrated with the sei-chain level chains. Will follow up with two more PRs Sanity check that bank sends aren't affected with the follow up PRs: 
masih
pushed a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Oct 1, 2025
masih
pushed a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Oct 9, 2025
LoadVersion should open DB with read only
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
https://linear.app/passportlabs/issue/PAS-812/[sei]-require-governance-proposal-for-new-token-pair-on-the-dex
Sample Register Pair proposal.json