Update alpine Docker digest to 865b95f

[renovate]

This PR contains the following updates:

Package	Type	Update	Change
alpine	final	digest	51183f2 -> 865b95f

---

Configuration

📅 Schedule: Branch creation - "on sunday" (UTC), Automerge - At any time (no schedule defined).

🚦 Automerge: Disabled by config. Please merge this manually once you are satisfied.

♻ Rebasing: Whenever PR is behind base branch, or you tick the rebase/retry checkbox.

🔕 Ignore: Close this PR and you won't be reminded about this update again.

---

• If you want to rebase/retry this PR, check this box

---

This PR was generated by Mend Renovate. View the repository job log.

[github-actions]

🤖 Claude Code Review

Code Review - Pull Request Analysis

Summary

This is a Docker base image update for the Alpine Linux image used in the final stage of the multi-stage Dockerfile. The digest is being updated from 51183f2... to 865b95f....

---

Detailed Review Against Checklist

Code Quality ✅

• [✅] Code follows style guide - Dockerfile follows standard conventions and Senzing formatting
• [✅] No commented-out code - None present
• [✅] Meaningful variable names - IMAGE_FINAL is clear and follows existing pattern
• [✅] DRY principle followed - N/A for this change
• [✅] Identify Defects - No defects identified. This is a straightforward image digest update, which is a common security/maintenance practice. No logic errors, race conditions, or security vulnerabilities introduced.
• [✅] Project memory configuration - The change aligns with project standards for dependency management

Location: package.Dockerfile:7

Testing ⚠️

• [⚠️] Unit tests for new functions - N/A for Docker image update
• [⚠️] Integration tests for new endpoints - N/A
• [⚠️] Edge cases covered - N/A
• [⚠️] Test coverage > 80% - Cannot verify if builds/container tests validate the new image

Recommendation: Verify that CI/CD pipeline includes Docker build verification to ensure the new Alpine image builds successfully and doesn't break runtime behavior.

Documentation ✅

• [✅] Readme updated if needed - Not required for base image digest update
• [✅] API docs updated - N/A
• [✅] Inline comments for complex logic - N/A
• [⚠️] CHANGELOG.md updated - Should verify if dependency updates are tracked in CHANGELOG
• [✅] Markdown formatting - N/A

Note: Typically, automated dependency updates (like Renovate/Dependabot) may not require CHANGELOG entries, but project standards should be verified.

Security ✅

• [✅] No hardcoded credentials - None present
• [✅] Input validation implemented - N/A
• [✅] Proper error handling - N/A
• [✅] No sensitive data in logs - N/A
• [✅] No license files (.lic) or AQAAAD strings - None present

Security Note: Updating Docker image digests is a security best practice as it ensures:

• Immutable image references (digest vs tag)
• Protection against tag manipulation attacks
• Explicit tracking of exact image versions

---

Overall Assessment

✅ APPROVED with minor recommendations

Strengths:

1. Proper security practice using image digests
2. Clean, minimal change with low risk
3. Follows existing patterns in the Dockerfile

Recommendations:

1. Verify the new Alpine image digest (865b95f...) corresponds to a legitimate Alpine release
2. Ensure CI/CD includes Docker build verification (noted from git history that PR senzing-garage/template-docker#135 add dockerfile verification #193 added Dockerfile verification)
3. Consider documenting dependency update process if this is automated (Renovate/Dependabot)

Risk Assessment: 🟢 LOW RISK

• Single line change
• Base image update only
• No code logic changes
• Verified by automated tools (likely Renovate based on commit pattern)

---

Action Items

None blocking - change is approved. Optional verification:

• Confirm CI build passes with new Alpine image
• Verify Alpine release notes for 865b95f... if concerned about breaking changes

---

Automated code review analyzing defects and coding standards

[renovate]

Edited/Blocked Notification

Renovate will not automatically rebase this PR, because it does not recognize the last commit author and assumes somebody else may have edited the PR.

You can manually request rebase by checking the rebase/retry box above.

⚠️ Warning: custom changes will be lost.

[github-actions]

🤖 Claude Code Review

I'll perform a comprehensive code review of this pull request against the provided checklist.

Code Review Analysis

Code Quality

✅ Code follows style guide - The changes are configuration files (JSON and Dockerfile), which follow appropriate formatting conventions.

✅ No commented-out code - No commented code found in the diff.

✅ Meaningful variable names - All variables and keys use clear, descriptive names (minimumReleaseAge, matchUpdateTypes, REFRESHED_AT, etc.).

✅ DRY principle followed - The changes don't introduce any repetition. The Renovate configuration properly uses packageRules to apply settings across multiple update types.

✅ Defects identification:

• No critical defects found
• The Renovate config refactoring properly moves minimumReleaseAge from root level into packageRules, which is the correct approach for applying age constraints to specific update types
• The date updates in package.Dockerfile are cosmetic and don't affect functionality
• The Alpine digest update is a standard dependency update

Minor observation: In .github/renovate.json:2, the enabledManagers array was moved from line 3 to line 7. While this doesn't break functionality, conventional JSON structure typically places specific configurations before general extends. This is purely stylistic.

✅ Project memory configuration - No violations of project-specific guidelines from .claude/CLAUDE.md detected. These are infrastructure configuration changes that don't affect the Go codebase structure.

Testing

❌ Testing requirements - Configuration files typically don't have unit tests, but this change should be verified:

• The Renovate configuration should be validated against the schema reference at line 2
• A test run of Renovate with the new config would confirm the behavior changes
• Recommendation: Consider testing the new prCreation: "not-pending" setting to ensure PRs are created as expected

⚠️ Test coverage - N/A for configuration files, but functional verification is recommended.

Documentation

❌ Documentation missing - No documentation updates provided:

• CHANGELOG.md should be updated to document:
  • Renovate configuration changes (especially prCreation: "not-pending" and the refactored minimumReleaseAge behavior)
  • Alpine base image digest update in package.Dockerfile
• README or docs should explain the Renovate policy if significant (the 21-day minimum release age is a notable stability policy)

✅ Markdown formatting - N/A, no markdown files changed.

Security

✅ No hardcoded credentials - No credentials present.

✅ No sensitive data in logs - N/A for these changes.

✅ No license files or AQAAAD strings - No problematic license files detected.

⚠️ Docker digest pinning - The Alpine image digest update (package.Dockerfile:7) changes from 51183f2cfa... to 865b95f46d.... This should be verified as legitimate:

• Recommendation: Confirm this digest corresponds to the intended Alpine version and hasn't been tampered with
• Verify via: docker pull alpine@sha256:865b95f46d98cf867a156fe4a135ad3fe50d2056aa3f25ed31662dff6da4eb62

✅ Input validation - N/A for configuration files.

✅ Proper error handling - N/A for configuration files.

---

Summary

Overall Assessment: ✅ Acceptable with minor improvements needed

Critical Issues: None

Required Changes:

1. Update CHANGELOG.md - Document the Renovate configuration changes and Alpine digest update
2. Verify Alpine digest - Confirm the new digest 865b95f46d... is legitimate and corresponds to the expected Alpine version

Recommendations:

1. Test the new Renovate configuration in a non-production context to ensure prCreation: "not-pending" behaves as expected
2. Consider adding a comment in renovate.json explaining the 21-day release age policy rationale

Strengths:

• Clean refactoring of Renovate configuration to use packageRules
• Consistent date updates across all stages in the Dockerfile
• Proper use of digest pinning for security

---

Automated code review analyzing defects and coding standards