Skip to content

docs(docs): Add Unified Thinking Model architecture#44

Merged
shettydev merged 1 commit intomainfrom
planning
Feb 15, 2026
Merged

docs(docs): Add Unified Thinking Model architecture#44
shettydev merged 1 commit intomainfrom
planning

Conversation

@shettydev
Copy link
Owner

@shettydev shettydev commented Feb 8, 2026

Description

This PR introduces the Unified Thinking Model documentation, detailing the architectural solution for the "Endless Dialogue Problem" and the "Two-World Problem" (Chat vs Canvas). It proposes a graph-based approach to thinking sessions where conversations have distinct resolution states.

Changes

  • Added packages/mukti-docs/planning/unified-thinking-model.md
  • Defined the Branch Resolution Model for node and session states (Exploring, Converging, Resolved).
  • Outlined the Convergence Protocol to detect user understanding and guide them to closure.
  • Detailed the Chat-Canvas Convergence strategy, treating every conversation as a linear traversal of a thought graph.
  • Proposed schema extensions for NodeDialogue and CanvasSession.

Testing

  • N/A (Documentation only)

Screenshots (if applicable)

  • N/A

Checklist

  • Code follows project style guidelines
  • Tests added/updated
  • Documentation updated (if needed)
  • No breaking changes (or documented if any)

Additional Notes

This document serves as the roadmap for the implementation of the new Socratic Engine mechanics, including state-aware prompting and the synthesis phase.

Outline a strategy to resolve endless dialogues and unify chat and
canvas modes using branch-level resolution and shared thought graphs.
@shettydev shettydev marked this pull request as ready for review February 11, 2026 18:04
@shettydev shettydev changed the title docs(docs): Add Socratic Engine framework design docs(docs): Add Unified Thinking Model architecture Feb 11, 2026
@shettydev shettydev merged commit a490d5b into main Feb 15, 2026
4 checks passed
@shettydev shettydev deleted the planning branch February 15, 2026 10:00
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant

Comments