Fix for filteting the issues by type_id#26
Conversation
vignesh-kandula-shipsy
requested review from
abu-b-sidq and
sumarpreet-kaur-shipsy
|
Important Review skippedAuto reviews are disabled on base/target branches other than the default branch. Please check the settings in the CodeRabbit UI or the You can disable this status message by setting the Thanks for using CodeRabbit! It's free for OSS, and your support helps us grow. If you like it, consider giving us a shout-out. 🪧 TipsChatThere are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:
Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments. CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)
Other keywords and placeholders
CodeRabbit Configuration File (
|
![gemini-code-assist[bot]](https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/in/956858?s=60&v=4){kind=small}
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Hello @vignesh-kandula-shipsy, I'm Gemini Code Assist1! I'm currently reviewing this pull request and will post my feedback shortly. In the meantime, here's a summary to help you and other reviewers quickly get up to speed!
Summary of Changes
This pull request introduces a fix for filtering issues by type_id. It adds a new filter function filter_issue_type_id to handle filtering based on the type_id parameter. This function retrieves the type_id from the request parameters and adds it to the issue filter. The issue_filters function is then updated to include this new filter in the list of available filters.
Highlights
- Filtering: Implements filtering of issues by
type_id. - New function: Introduces
filter_issue_type_idto handle the filtering logic. - Configuration: Updates
issue_filtersto include the newtype_idfilter.
Changelog
- apiserver/plane/utils/issue_filters.py
- Added
filter_issue_type_idfunction to filter issues by type_id (lines 610-616). - Modified
issue_filtersfunction to includetype_idin the filter options (line 640).
- Added
Using Gemini Code Assist
The full guide for Gemini Code Assist can be found on our documentation page, here are some quick tips.
Invoking Gemini
You can request assistance from Gemini at any point in your pull request via creating an issue comment (i.e. comment on the pull request page) using either /gemini <command> or @gemini-code-assist <command>. Below is a summary of the supported commands.
| Feature | Command | Description |
|---|---|---|
| Code Review | /gemini review |
Performs a code review for the current pull request in its current state. |
| Pull Request Summary | /gemini summary |
Provides a summary of the current pull request in its current state. |
| Comment | @gemini-code-assist | Responds in comments when explicitly tagged, both in issue comments and review comments. |
| Help | /gemini help |
Displays a list of available commands. |
Customization
To customize Gemini Code Assist for GitHub experience, repository maintainers can create a configuration file and/or provide a custom code review style guide (such as PEP-8 for Python) by creating and adding files to a .gemini/ folder in the base of the repository. Detailed instructions can be found here.
Limitations & Feedback
Gemini Code Assist is currently in preview and may make mistakes. Please leave feedback on any instances where its feedback is incorrect or counter productive. You can react with 👍 and 👎 on @gemini-code-assist comments to provide feedback.
You can also get AI-powered code generation, chat, as well as code reviews directly in the IDE at no cost with the Gemini Code Assist IDE Extension.
Did you know?
Python dictionaries are implemented using hash tables, which provide average-case O(1) time complexity for most operations, including getting and setting values.
Footnotes
-
Review the Privacy Notices, Generative AI Prohibited Use Policy, Terms of Service, and learn how to configure Gemini Code Assist in GitHub here. Gemini can make mistakes, so double check it and use code with caution. ↩
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Code Review
The pull request introduces a new filter for issues based on their type ID. The implementation appears straightforward and integrates well with the existing filtering mechanism. However, there are a few areas where the code can be improved for clarity and maintainability.
Merge Readiness
The code is relatively simple and addresses the intended functionality. However, I recommend addressing the comments below before merging to improve code clarity and maintainability. I am unable to directly approve this pull request, and recommend that others review and approve this code before merging.
| def filter_issue_type_id(params, issue_filter, method, prefix=""): | ||
| """ | ||
| Filter issues by type_id | ||
| """ |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Consider adding a more descriptive docstring that explains the purpose of the filter, the expected input (params), and the output (modification of issue_filter). Also, it would be helpful to specify the data type of type_id and how it's used in the filter.
"""
Filter issues by type_id.
Args:
params (dict): A dictionary of request parameters.
issue_filter (dict): The issue filter dictionary to modify.
method (str): HTTP method (unused).
prefix (str): Prefix for the parameter name (default: "").
Returns:
None: Modifies the issue_filter dictionary in place.
"""| type_id = params.get(f"{prefix}type_id", None) | ||
| if type_id is not None: | ||
| issue_filter[f"{prefix}type_id"] = type_id |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
It would be good to add some validation or error handling to ensure that type_id is a valid type. For example, you could check if it's an integer or a UUID, depending on the expected format. If it's not valid, you could either skip the filter or raise an exception.
type_id = params.get(f"{prefix}type_id", None)
if type_id is not None:
try:
type_id = int(type_id) # or uuid.UUID(type_id) if it's a UUID
issue_filter[f"{prefix}type_id"] = type_id
except ValueError:
# Log the error or skip the filter
pass
2 participants
No description provided.