Pretty print arrays of structs #33
Open
Conversation
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
shustinm
requested changes
May 14, 2021
Owner
shustinm
left a comment
shustinm
left a comment
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Better than before, could still probably be cleaned up but this is not top priority. Having to import something dynamically is smelly.
| if isinstance(field, Struct): | ||
| x.append('\t{} ({}):'.format(name, field.__class__.__qualname__)) | ||
| x.extend('\t{}'.format(field_str) for field_str in str(field).splitlines()[1:]) | ||
| if isinstance(field, (Struct, Array)): |
Owner
There was a problem hiding this comment.
What about Vector? This probably should be _Sequence instead of Array
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
2 participants
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
No description provided.