Currently, the version attribute returned by the SCIM server in the meta section of a resource is a number. The RFC for SCIM 2 indicates this should be an ETag. Most implementations I've worked with (and indeed all of the RFC examples) have this attribute as a string, so our parsing logic falls down when this SCIM server returns a number.
See: https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/html/rfc7643#section-3.1