Allow additional controls in policy #103
Merged
Conversation
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Now storing the controls met explicitly instead of the level. This makes it more flexible for folks to adopt higher/lower levels. Older provenance won't evaluate to higher slsa levels anymore. Signed-off-by: Tom Hennen <tomhennen@google.com>
Now using the same type in provenance as in GhControlStatus. This simplifies a lot of logic. Signed-off-by: Tom Hennen <tomhennen@google.com>
Signed-off-by: Tom Hennen <tomhennen@google.com>
Signed-off-by: Tom Hennen <tomhennen@google.com>
Signed-off-by: Tom Hennen <tomhennen@google.com>
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
1 participant
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
The tool now allows additional controls to be enforced via policy.
It also enables reflecting these things within the VSA.
-draftsince its still in flux.