Skip to content

Run go mod tidy over Go projects#3

Open
sourcegraph-bot wants to merge 1 commit intomasterfrom
go-mod-tidy-sourcegraph
Open

Run go mod tidy over Go projects#3
sourcegraph-bot wants to merge 1 commit intomasterfrom
go-mod-tidy-sourcegraph

Conversation

@sourcegraph-bot
Copy link

@sourcegraph-bot sourcegraph-bot commented Mar 5, 2020

This campaign is part of our Campaigns delivery plan.

It runs go mod tidy in every project in our sourcegraph GitHub organization if it has a go.mod file.

Find this campaign here

Copy link
Member

@eseliger eseliger left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

test

@eseliger eseliger closed this Mar 12, 2020
@eseliger eseliger reopened this Mar 12, 2020
Copy link
Member

@eseliger eseliger left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

test

@eseliger eseliger dismissed their stale review March 14, 2020 23:20

test over

@sourcegraph-bot sourcegraph-bot force-pushed the go-mod-tidy-sourcegraph branch from cfa5f22 to 6e64908 Compare April 17, 2020 15:12
@sourcegraph-bot sourcegraph-bot changed the title Go mod tidy sourcegraph Run go mod tidy over Go projects Apr 17, 2020
@sourcegraph-bot sourcegraph-bot force-pushed the go-mod-tidy-sourcegraph branch from 6e64908 to b2fb683 Compare May 25, 2020 23:20
@sourcegraph-bot sourcegraph-bot changed the title Run go mod tidy over Go projects Run go mod tidy over Go projects333 May 25, 2020
@sourcegraph-bot sourcegraph-bot force-pushed the go-mod-tidy-sourcegraph branch from b2fb683 to 6e64908 Compare May 25, 2020 23:20
@sourcegraph-bot sourcegraph-bot changed the title Run go mod tidy over Go projects333 Run go mod tidy over Go projects May 25, 2020
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants

Comments