Fix e2e test regarding terminal prompt expectation#1429
Conversation
Updated `tests/e2e/tests/e2e.spec.ts` to explicitly assert the presence of the prompt (`>>>`) in the terminal output after command execution. This addresses the reported failure where the prompt was considered an unexpected value, and ensures the test verifies that the REPL is ready for subsequent input. The timeout for the output check was also updated to use the default configuration.
|
👋 Jules, reporting for duty! I'm here to lend a hand with this pull request. When you start a review, I'll add a 👀 emoji to each comment to let you know I've read it. I'll focus on feedback directed at me and will do my best to stay out of conversations between you and other bots or reviewers to keep the noise down. I'll push a commit with your requested changes shortly after. Please note there might be a delay between these steps, but rest assured I'm on the job! For more direct control, you can switch me to Reactive Mode. When this mode is on, I will only act on comments where you specifically mention me with For security, I will only act on instructions from the user who triggered this task. New to Jules? Learn more at jules.google/docs. |
Summary
Previous Results
Insights
Fail Rate
Failed Tests
Slowest Tests
🍂 No flaky tests in this run. Github Test Reporter by CTRF 💚 |
Updated the end-to-end test for the reverse shell REPL to include an assertion for the prompt
>>>. This ensures that the test correctly validates the full interaction cycle (command input -> output -> new prompt) and resolves potential issues where the prompt's presence was causing test failures or was unaccounted for. Removed hardcoded timeout in favor of defaults.PR created automatically by Jules for task 16611687431211269000 started by @KCarretto