Conversation
|
This commit utterly breaks by use case for the Plus editor. I use my own stylesheets (and even a little js) in almost all the notes where I use Plus (if I didn't need that, I'd be using the Bold editor instead). I've been using Plus this way for years, as a full-featured HTML editor/viewer, for a good number of my notes... Kinda like editing in vi/emacs/notepad and viewing in the browser, only done within SN for security/privacy. I compose the notes in the Plain editor, then import them into Plus with all the formatting I want, and use Plus to view them (and edit, if necessary). What's worse, I'm glad I have backups, and that most of my notes, once written are Locked. Because dompurify is removing custom classes and attributes from some of my tags, where these contain meaningful metadata, and is therefore causing a loss of valuable data anytime I try to edit an existing Plus note. |
|
@mobitar Between this change, the changes, to permissions, and the loss of the ability to search Protected notes, I'm getting very nervous about what other "enhancements" coming down the pipeline that may break my most important use cases for SN. I can't possibly be the only one for whom these are breaking changes. |
This reverts commit e175852 because the dompurify stuff breaks my use of custom css.
3 participants
No description provided.