test: fix typo in test description

[Planeshifter]

Description

Follow-up fixes for commits merged to develop between 2026-05-16 23:58:43 -0700 and 2026-05-17 01:31:08 -0700.

That window contained 11 first-parent commits: two new BLAS packages (blas/ext/base/gaxpb, blas/base/ndarray/snrm2) plus their namespace registrations, an ESLint forward-compatibility fix (context.getFilename() → context.filename), a Makefile lint-variable rename, an EditorConfig whitespace fix, format-based error messages across several datasets/* build scripts, and auto-generated TypeScript/docs updates. Reviewing the diff surfaced one validated, high-signal issue.

Fixes, grouped by package:

blas/ext/base/gaxpb

• Fix subject-verb agreement typo in lib/node_modules/@stdlib/blas/ext/base/gaxpb/test/test.main.js (line 143, introduced in b28f7b8): test description read "the function add beta" but should read "the function adds beta", matching the parallel phrasing already present in test.ndarray.js.

Related Issues

None.

Questions

No.

Other

Validation

• Style-guide compliance: all changed/new files were audited against docs/style-guides and compared to established reference packages (blas/ext/base/gapx, blas/base/ndarray/sdot, and siblings) by two independent reviewers.
• Bug scan: all gaxpb/snrm2 worked examples, test expectations, and core logic (N <= 0 guard, alpha === 1.0/beta === 0.0 fast paths, 5x unit-stride loop unrolling, ndarray delegation) were verified arithmetically by two independent reviewers; no runtime bugs found.
• Deliberately excluded: observations requiring interpretation or out-of-diff validation were not acted on — the snrm2 package.json "squared" keyword (judgment call, not corroborated by the second reviewer), comment-backtick stylistic preferences, an alternative repl.txt example phrasing, and the auto-generated chebyshevSeries JSDoc example (// returns 0.75) whose correctness cannot be confirmed without inspecting the source package outside the diff window.

Checklist

• Read, understood, and followed the contributing guidelines.

AI Assistance

When authoring the changes proposed in this PR, did you use any kind of AI assistance?

• Yes
• No

If you answered "yes" above, how did you use AI assistance?

• Code generation (e.g., when writing an implementation or fixing a bug)
• Test/benchmark generation
• Documentation (including examples)
• Research and understanding

Disclosure

This PR was authored by Claude Code. An automated multi-agent review of the last 24 hours of commits to develop flagged the typo; the one-line fix was applied and verified by Claude Code.

---

Generated by Claude Code

[stdlib-bot]

Coverage Report

Package	Statements	Branches	Functions	Lines
blas/ext/base/gaxpb	$\color{green}290/290$ $\color{green}+100.00%$	$\color{green}26/26$ $\color{green}+100.00%$	$\color{green}3/3$ $\color{green}+100.00%$	$\color{green}290/290$ $\color{green}+100.00%$

The above coverage report was generated for the changes in this PR.