Skip to content

Conversation

@pcarruscag
Copy link
Member

Proposed Changes

I broke it when I defined the reference factor for aerodynamic coefficients in a central location.
Oh well... It would be good to add some regressions for output files, or to try to include more postprocessing quantities in the regressions by adding them to the screen outputs.

@pcarruscag
Copy link
Member Author

Looks like this bug was not released :) (Fortune favours the bold)

Copy link
Contributor

@TobiKattmann TobiKattmann left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

LGTM... and while we're at it, you mentioned yesterday an interview with a NASA guy concerning lgtm ()if I recall correctly). I would be interested in that source :)

And I guess you're onto sth concerning screen output for reg tests... this # last four columns was understood as the rule I guess and sometimes that includes the iterations number :)

@pcarruscag
Copy link
Member Author

It was a code review by Jason Turner (https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=RbhufLudVsI&t=1743s&ab_channel=C%E1%90%A9%E1%90%A9WeeklyWithJasonTurner)

Quite a long video, I did not watch it all.

@pcarruscag
Copy link
Member Author

Yeah what I'm sayin is put more columns.

@pcarruscag pcarruscag merged commit 0674539 into develop Feb 25, 2021
@pcarruscag pcarruscag deleted the fix_cskin_friction branch February 25, 2021 09:03
@TobiKattmann
Copy link
Contributor

Yeah, but listening to Mr Turner is surely well invested time if one is able to follow at least some of his thoughts. But imo he does a good job in that, I sometimes tune in for cppcast and that is okayish to follow most of the time (but that is not really in depth tbh)

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants