Access solution and primitives via python wrapper

[pcarruscag]

Proposed Changes

@patelha57 @aa-g @Nicola-Fonzi @bigfooted
I'm proposing this as the way to interact with volume fields via the python wrapper.
We create a matrix view (does not copy data) into the coordinates, solution, primitives, etc. which then allows point-wise or row-wise access to the data (read or write). We can extend it to also expose derivative information.
For example:

coords = driver.Coordinates()
print(coords(iPoint, 1)) # read a value
coords.Set(iPoint, (x, y, z)) # write a row
coords.Set(iPoint, 0, coords.Get(iPoint, 0)) # set a value and different way of reading a value

solversIndices = driver.GetSolverIndices() # maps solver names to our solver integers, similar to what we do with markers
solution = driver.Solution(solverIndices["C.FLOW"]) # same object type as coords

primitiveIndices = driver.GetPrimitiveIndices() # maps primitive names to their indices.
temperatureIndex = primitiveIndices["TEMPERATURE"]
primitives = driver.Primitives()
print(primitives(iPoint, temperatureIndex))

PR Checklist

• I am submitting my contribution to the develop branch.
• My contribution generates no new compiler warnings (try with --warnlevel=3 when using meson).
• My contribution is commented and consistent with SU2 style (https://su2code.github.io/docs_v7/Style-Guide/).
• I have added a test case that demonstrates my contribution, if necessary.
• I have updated appropriate documentation (Tutorials, Docs Page, config_template.cpp), if necessary.

[bigfooted]

Oh, that's great! I like this way to get the solver index. This would also clean up the flamelet PR, that has a hacky pywrapper implementation for creating an initial solution for the flamelet solver.

[bigfooted]

LGTM, if no more changes are required for this PR, let's merge it.

[bigfooted]

maybe @patelha57 @aa-g have additional comments? Else let's merge, LGTM.

[pcarruscag]

I talked with @Nicola-Fonzi and I'll try to use the same "matrix view" strategy for data at markers. But if the current solution unblocks the flamelet work go ahead and merge this.

[bigfooted]

Ok, thanks. I will merge this now, then clean up the flamelet branch, so it will be ready for review next week.