Skip to content

[level order and can finish]#1629

Open
takchiks wants to merge 1 commit intosuper30admin:masterfrom
takchiks:master
Open

[level order and can finish]#1629
takchiks wants to merge 1 commit intosuper30admin:masterfrom
takchiks:master

Conversation

@takchiks
Copy link
Copy Markdown

@takchiks takchiks commented Mar 4, 2026

No description provided.

@super30admin
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Owner

Strengths:

  • The recursive approach for level order traversal is correct and efficiently implemented.
  • The code is clean and easy to understand.
  • The base case is handled properly.

Areas for Improvement:

  1. Remove unrelated code: The canFinish method is not part of the problem and should be deleted to avoid confusion.
  2. Consider using iterative BFS: While the recursive DFS works, the problem is typically solved with iterative BFS using a queue. This avoids potential stack overflow for very deep trees and is the standard approach for level order traversal.
  3. Improve naming: Rename the helper function to something more descriptive, such as dfsForLevelOrder or collectLevels.
  4. Consistency: Ensure that the solution only includes code relevant to the problem. The presence of canFinish suggests that the student might have mixed up solutions for different problems.

Here is an example of how the iterative BFS solution would look in Java for comparison:

public List<List<Integer>> levelOrder(TreeNode root) {
    List<List<Integer>> result = new ArrayList<>();
    if (root == null) return result;
    
    Queue<TreeNode> queue = new LinkedList<>();
    queue.offer(root);
    
    while (!queue.isEmpty()) {
        int levelSize = queue.size();
        List<Integer> currentLevel = new ArrayList<>();
        for (int i = 0; i < levelSize; i++) {
            TreeNode node = queue.poll();
            currentLevel.add(node.val);
            if (node.left != null) queue.offer(node.left);
            if (node.right != null) queue.offer(node.right);
        }
        result.add(currentLevel);
    }
    return result;
}

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants