Linked List 2 complete

[Tanmay-Nalawade]

No description provided.

[super30admin]

1. Correctness: The second approach for BST Iterator is correct and meets the problem requirements. The first approach, while functionally correct, does not meet the space complexity constraints.
2. Time Complexity: The second approach correctly achieves amortized O(1) time complexity for next() and hasNext(), and O(h) for initialization.
3. Space Complexity: The second approach correctly uses O(h) space, where h is the height of the tree, which is optimal.
4. Code Quality: The code is well-structured and readable. However, including unrelated code from other problems is confusing and should be avoided.
5. Efficiency: The second approach is efficient and follows the best practices for implementing an iterator over a BST.

Areas for Improvement:

• Remove unrelated code from the submission to keep it focused on the problem at hand.
• Clearly separate and label different approaches if multiple solutions are provided.
• Ensure that all solutions meet the problem constraints, especially space complexity.

Strengths:

• The student demonstrates a good understanding of the problem and provides a correct and efficient solution in the second approach.
• The code is clean and follows good practices.