Conversation
|
Reverting work made in #43 without discussing it feels wrong. You let some PR opened for days and now you are reverting some work without asking. Some java generators are using the values: I am not sure that the values will still be available in the templates. |
|
I understand your point, and i'll updates generators that use those values so we won't notice any difference. Sorry about my rush, we can talk about it and i can revert it. I'm just trying to avoid issues for new generators migrated. |
|
for generators that initializes the {{modelPackage}} and {{apiPackage}} values (like php) from constructor The reverted commit was affecting the and the That's the main reason to revert commit, now we just need to add those values for |
|
I have described the requested feature here: #55. For consistency reasons I am still convinced that the way I implemented it is way better. Because of one special case, you are implying that every generator should do the “if map doesn’t contain key then use the member value“ check. This feels wrong because As for your custom case in the Move your custom logic for PHP in I have used this pattern in the Please merge #56 to revert this and I will help you with the PHP generator. |
No description provided.