Overriden objectmapper wasn't used in deserialisation (Scala) #4532#4533
Closed
lachatak wants to merge 2 commits intoswagger-api:masterfrom
Closed
Overriden objectmapper wasn't used in deserialisation (Scala) #4532#4533lachatak wants to merge 2 commits intoswagger-api:masterfrom
lachatak wants to merge 2 commits intoswagger-api:masterfrom
Conversation
Use previously provided apiInvoker instead of creating a instance at deserialision stage
Contributor
|
@lachatak thanks for the PR. For your upcoming PRs (not this one), I would recommend you to create a new branch for the change as per git best practices. |
Contributor
Author
|
just to conform with the git recommendations new git branch was created with a new PR |
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
2 participants
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Use previously provided apiInvoker instead of creating a new instance at deserialisation stage
See issue #4532