Remove temporary workaround for SR-3202 #1070
Merged
Conversation
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Contributor
Author
Contributor
Author
|
Also, is it expected that |
Contributor
|
@swift-ci please test |
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
3 participants
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
This succeeds #1043 which was merged and later reverted. This PR has more love for Linux.
Turns out on Linux
Swift.Boolcan not be converted toFoundation.NSNumber. On Darwin the conversion works fine. That's why the tests failed on Linux.For the test cases,
en_UKisn't really a valid locale identifier. Foren_UKlibicu actually returns a fallback value for measurement system(UMS_SI) instead ofUMS_UK. To prevent further confusion I'd sayen_GBis a better option.