Skip to content

Conversation

@peteraxis
Copy link

For use of MaxLinear GSW1xx DSA driver in Linux.
v2: Renamed to Special Tag, merged to one page for Special-Tag.

For use of MaxLinear GSW1xx DSA driver in Linux.
;;
gsw1xx-switch-tag)
title='GSW1XX switch tag | '
;;
Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

This change has no purpose in this version.


<tr>
<td class="symbol">LINKTYPE_DSA_TAG_GSW1XX</td>
<td class="number">302</td>
Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

This should be 303 and should appear after LINKTYPE_EDK2_MM below because the table is sorted by numeric ID.

Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Correction: it should be 304, let me add the latest assignment to the table first.

Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Done. Please use the latest master branch and make it 304.

</ul>
Format of (Ethertyped) Ingress tagged frames:
<pre>
+0 +----+----+----+----+----+----+----+----+
Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Please note indentation is off in the packet diagrams.

+6 +----+----+----+----+----+----+----+----+ +-
| Prog. DSA Ether Type [15:8] | | (8-byte) Special Tag
+1 +----+----+----+----+----+----+----+----+ | Contains a programmable Ether type.
| Prog. DSA Ether Type [7:0] | | +
Copy link
Member

@infrastation infrastation Dec 8, 2025

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Special Tag Content ends in the middle of programmable EtherType in this packet diagram, should be exactly 6 bytes after EtherType according to the data sheet.

@infrastation infrastation mentioned this pull request Dec 8, 2025
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants