Skip to content

Conversation

@jmanucornejo
Copy link
Contributor

Se corrige la funcion numberLimit para que no elimine los decimales si el valor es menor a "$decimals".

Ejemplo:
En algunos casos los XML tienen hasta 10 decimales psoibles. En invoice2.1.xml.tiwg en el PriceAmount se puede ver un caso.

Sin embargo, si envias un número menor (por decir, 6 decimales) la función te devuelve 2 decimales por default, lo que hace imposible enviar más de dos decimales y menos de 10 decimales.

La corrección hace que, si la validación de que tiene más de X decimales es falsa, simplemente de devuela el número original, con los decimales que tenía, sin formatearlo.

Se corrige la funcion numberLimit para que no elimine los decimales si el valor es menor a "$decimals"
@sonarqubecloud
Copy link

Quality Gate Passed Quality Gate passed

Kudos, no new issues were introduced!

0 New issues
0 Security Hotspots
No data about Coverage
No data about Duplication

See analysis details on SonarCloud

@giansalex giansalex added the bug label Dec 15, 2023
@codecov
Copy link

codecov bot commented Dec 15, 2023

Codecov Report

All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests ✅

Comparison is base (02901b1) 98.60% compared to head (19ede68) 98.60%.

Additional details and impacted files
@@            Coverage Diff            @@
##             master     #231   +/-   ##
=========================================
  Coverage     98.60%   98.60%           
  Complexity     1306     1306           
=========================================
  Files           173      173           
  Lines          5443     5443           
=========================================
  Hits           5367     5367           
  Misses           76       76           
Flag Coverage Δ
unittests 98.60% <100.00%> (ø)

Flags with carried forward coverage won't be shown. Click here to find out more.

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

@giansalex giansalex merged commit 5755d88 into thegreenter:master Dec 15, 2023
@giansalex
Copy link
Member

@jmanucornejo gracias por la contribución, el cambio se incluyo en la versión v5.0.3

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants