Skip to content

Conversation

@charleskeepax
Copy link

No description provided.

plbossart
plbossart previously approved these changes Jul 31, 2024
Copy link
Member

@plbossart plbossart left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

sounds good but don't we also need the machine driver quirks?

@bardliao
Copy link
Collaborator

bardliao commented Aug 1, 2024

sounds good but don't we also need the machine driver quirks?

@plbossart I think quirks is needed only if cs42l43 speaker is used or cs42l43 works as bridge mode.

bardliao
bardliao previously approved these changes Aug 1, 2024
@charleskeepax
Copy link
Author

Yeah some quirks will need to be added, but I am being a little more cautious with sending up the quirks as they depend on the SSID and as we found out with the last set sometimes those aren't as locked down as I thought. Where as these bus layouts are locked down pretty early.

Add some new match table entries on Arrowlake for some coming cs42l43
laptops.

Signed-off-by: Charles Keepax <ckeepax@opensource.cirrus.com>
Add some new match table entries on Alderlake for some coming cs42l43
laptops.

Signed-off-by: Charles Keepax <ckeepax@opensource.cirrus.com>
Add some new match table entries on Lunarlake for some coming cs42l43
laptops.

Signed-off-by: Charles Keepax <ckeepax@opensource.cirrus.com>
@bardliao bardliao requested a review from plbossart August 9, 2024 01:49
@plbossart
Copy link
Member

plbossart commented Aug 9, 2024

@charleskeepax @bardliao are all the topologies listed in this PR part of the SOF tree now?

Confused about this PR thesofproject/sof#9355 which is still a draft ....

@bardliao
Copy link
Collaborator

bardliao commented Aug 9, 2024

@charleskeepax @bardliao are all the topologies listed in this PR part of the SOF tree now?

Confused about this PR thesofproject/sof#9355 which is still a draft ....

This is a draft because it has not been tested on the actual device, yet.

@charleskeepax
Copy link
Author

Most of these are missing actually topologies yet, do you generally prefer to merge the topologies before the match entries? I could probably put a patch together although I don't have hardware to test most of them.

@plbossart
Copy link
Member

it's usually better to merge and send this stuff upstream due to the development process, the patches will not be in Linus' tree before end of the year.
But we do want to avoid misses in topology and make sure the sof-bin stuff does have the topologies ready. This is best tracked with a Sof GitHub/topology issue and a milestone.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants