-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 140
ASoC: intel: sof_rt5682: set platform name for dai links #629
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Conversation
94a8fd4 to
17d286d
Compare
plbossart
left a comment
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
only minor nitpicks to align with other drivers
sound/soc/intel/boards/sof_rt5682.c
Outdated
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
try to follow the other machine drivers and put this in the code block, not in declarations.
sound/soc/intel/boards/sof_rt5682.c
Outdated
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
separate line for ret
Set platform name for dai links. Signed-off-by: Ranjani Sridharan <ranjani.sridharan@linux.intel.com>
17d286d to
ca962eb
Compare
|
@plbossart updated now |
plbossart
left a comment
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Thanks Ranjani
Damien Le Moal reports a lockdep splat with the acpi_power_meter, observed with Linux v5.5 and later. ====================================================== WARNING: possible circular locking dependency detected 5.6.0-rc2+ thesofproject#629 Not tainted ------------------------------------------------------ python/1397 is trying to acquire lock: ffff888619080070 (&resource->lock){+.+.}, at: show_power+0x3c/0xa0 [acpi_power_meter] but task is already holding lock: ffff88881643f188 (kn->count#119){++++}, at: kernfs_seq_start+0x6a/0x160 which lock already depends on the new lock. the existing dependency chain (in reverse order) is: -> #1 (kn->count#119){++++}: __kernfs_remove+0x626/0x7e0 kernfs_remove_by_name_ns+0x41/0x80 remove_attrs+0xcb/0x3c0 [acpi_power_meter] acpi_power_meter_notify+0x1f7/0x310 [acpi_power_meter] acpi_ev_notify_dispatch+0x198/0x1f3 acpi_os_execute_deferred+0x4d/0x70 process_one_work+0x7c8/0x1340 worker_thread+0x94/0xc70 kthread+0x2ed/0x3f0 ret_from_fork+0x24/0x30 -> #0 (&resource->lock){+.+.}: __lock_acquire+0x20be/0x49b0 lock_acquire+0x127/0x340 __mutex_lock+0x15b/0x1350 show_power+0x3c/0xa0 [acpi_power_meter] dev_attr_show+0x3f/0x80 sysfs_kf_seq_show+0x216/0x410 seq_read+0x407/0xf90 vfs_read+0x152/0x2c0 ksys_read+0xf3/0x1d0 do_syscall_64+0x95/0x1010 entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x49/0xbe other info that might help us debug this: Possible unsafe locking scenario: CPU0 CPU1 ---- ---- lock(kn->count#119); lock(&resource->lock); lock(kn->count#119); lock(&resource->lock); *** DEADLOCK *** 4 locks held by python/1397: #0: ffff8890242d64e0 (&f->f_pos_lock){+.+.}, at: __fdget_pos+0x9b/0xb0 #1: ffff889040be74e0 (&p->lock){+.+.}, at: seq_read+0x6b/0xf90 #2: ffff8890448eb880 (&of->mutex){+.+.}, at: kernfs_seq_start+0x47/0x160 #3: ffff88881643f188 (kn->count#119){++++}, at: kernfs_seq_start+0x6a/0x160 stack backtrace: CPU: 10 PID: 1397 Comm: python Not tainted 5.6.0-rc2+ thesofproject#629 Hardware name: Supermicro Super Server/X11DPL-i, BIOS 3.1 05/21/2019 Call Trace: dump_stack+0x97/0xe0 check_noncircular+0x32e/0x3e0 ? print_circular_bug.isra.0+0x1e0/0x1e0 ? unwind_next_frame+0xb9a/0x1890 ? entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x49/0xbe ? graph_lock+0x79/0x170 ? __lockdep_reset_lock+0x3c0/0x3c0 ? mark_lock+0xbc/0x1150 __lock_acquire+0x20be/0x49b0 ? mark_held_locks+0xe0/0xe0 ? stack_trace_save+0x91/0xc0 lock_acquire+0x127/0x340 ? show_power+0x3c/0xa0 [acpi_power_meter] ? device_remove_bin_file+0x10/0x10 ? device_remove_bin_file+0x10/0x10 __mutex_lock+0x15b/0x1350 ? show_power+0x3c/0xa0 [acpi_power_meter] ? show_power+0x3c/0xa0 [acpi_power_meter] ? mutex_lock_io_nested+0x11f0/0x11f0 ? lock_downgrade+0x6a0/0x6a0 ? kernfs_seq_start+0x47/0x160 ? lock_acquire+0x127/0x340 ? kernfs_seq_start+0x6a/0x160 ? device_remove_bin_file+0x10/0x10 ? show_power+0x3c/0xa0 [acpi_power_meter] show_power+0x3c/0xa0 [acpi_power_meter] dev_attr_show+0x3f/0x80 ? memset+0x20/0x40 sysfs_kf_seq_show+0x216/0x410 seq_read+0x407/0xf90 ? security_file_permission+0x16f/0x2c0 vfs_read+0x152/0x2c0 Problem is that reading an attribute takes the kernfs lock in the kernfs code, then resource->lock in the driver. During an ACPI notification, the opposite happens: The resource lock is taken first, followed by the kernfs lock when sysfs attributes are removed and re-created. Presumably this is now seen due to some locking related changes in kernfs after v5.4, but it was likely always a problem. Fix the problem by not blindly acquiring the lock in the notification function. It is only needed to protect the various update functions. However, those update functions are called anyway when sysfs attributes are read. This means that we can just stop calling those functions from the notifier, and the resource lock in the notifier function is no longer needed. That leaves two situations: First, METER_NOTIFY_CONFIG removes and re-allocates capability strings. While it did so under the resource lock, _displaying_ those strings was not protected, creating a race condition. To solve this problem, selectively protect both removal/creation and reporting of capability attributes with the resource lock. Second, removing and re-creating the attribute files is no longer protected by the resource lock. That doesn't matter since access to each individual attribute is protected by the kernfs lock. Userspace may get messed up if attributes disappear and reappear under its nose, but that is not different than today, and there is nothing we can do about it without major driver restructuring. Last but not least, when removing the driver, remove attribute functions first, then release capability strings. This avoids yet another race condition. Reported-by: Damien Le Moal <Damien.LeMoal@wdc.com> Cc: Damien Le Moal <Damien.LeMoal@wdc.com> Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org # v5.5+ Tested-by: Damien Le Moal <damien.lemoal@wdc.com> Signed-off-by: Guenter Roeck <linux@roeck-us.net>
Fixes the following splat on a6xx gen2+ (a640, a650, a660 families), a6xx gen1 has smaller GMU allocations so they fit under the default 64K max segment size. ------------[ cut here ]------------ DMA-API: msm_dpu ae01000.display-controller: mapping sg segment longer than device claims to support [len=126976] [max=65536] WARNING: CPU: 5 PID: 9 at kernel/dma/debug.c:1160 debug_dma_map_sg+0x288/0x314 Modules linked in: CPU: 5 PID: 9 Comm: kworker/u16:0 Not tainted 6.3.0-rc2-debug+ #629 Hardware name: Google Villager (rev1+) with LTE (DT) Workqueue: events_unbound deferred_probe_work_func pstate: 60400009 (nZCv daif +PAN -UAO -TCO -DIT -SSBS BTYPE=--) pc : debug_dma_map_sg+0x288/0x314 lr : debug_dma_map_sg+0x288/0x314 sp : ffffffc00809b560 x29: ffffffc00809b560 x28: 0000000000000060 x27: 0000000000000000 x26: 0000000000010000 x25: 0000000000000004 x24: 0000000000000004 x23: ffffffffffffffff x22: ffffffdb31693cc0 x21: ffffff8080935800 x20: ffffff8087417400 x19: ffffff8087a45010 x18: 0000000000000000 x17: 0000000000000000 x16: 0000000000000000 x15: 0000000000010000 x14: 0000000000000001 x13: ffffffffffffffff x12: ffffffffffffffff x11: 0000000000000000 x10: 000000000000000a x9 : ffffffdb2ff05e14 x8 : ffffffdb31275000 x7 : ffffffdb2ff08908 x6 : 0000000000000000 x5 : 0000000000000001 x4 : ffffffdb2ff08a74 x3 : ffffffdb31275008 x2 : 0000000000000000 x1 : 0000000000000000 x0 : ffffff80803a9a80 Call trace: debug_dma_map_sg+0x288/0x314 __dma_map_sg_attrs+0x80/0xe4 dma_map_sgtable+0x30/0x4c get_pages+0x1d4/0x1e4 msm_gem_pin_pages_locked+0xbc/0xf8 msm_gem_pin_vma_locked+0x58/0xa0 msm_gem_get_and_pin_iova_range+0x98/0xac a6xx_gmu_memory_alloc+0x7c/0x128 a6xx_gmu_init+0x16c/0x9b0 a6xx_gpu_init+0x38c/0x3e4 adreno_bind+0x214/0x264 component_bind_all+0x128/0x1f8 msm_drm_bind+0x2b8/0x608 try_to_bring_up_aggregate_device+0x88/0x1a4 __component_add+0xec/0x13c component_add+0x1c/0x28 dp_display_probe+0x3f8/0x43c platform_probe+0x70/0xc4 really_probe+0x148/0x280 __driver_probe_device+0xc8/0xe0 driver_probe_device+0x44/0x100 __device_attach_driver+0x64/0xdc bus_for_each_drv+0xb0/0xd8 __device_attach+0xd8/0x168 device_initial_probe+0x1c/0x28 bus_probe_device+0x44/0xb0 deferred_probe_work_func+0xc8/0xe0 process_one_work+0x2e0/0x488 process_scheduled_works+0x4c/0x50 worker_thread+0x218/0x274 kthread+0xf0/0x100 ret_from_fork+0x10/0x20 irq event stamp: 293712 hardirqs last enabled at (293711): [<ffffffdb2ff0893c>] vprintk_emit+0x160/0x25c hardirqs last disabled at (293712): [<ffffffdb30b48130>] el1_dbg+0x24/0x80 softirqs last enabled at (279520): [<ffffffdb2fe10420>] __do_softirq+0x21c/0x4bc softirqs last disabled at (279515): [<ffffffdb2fe16708>] ____do_softirq+0x18/0x24 ---[ end trace 0000000000000000 ]--- Signed-off-by: Rob Clark <robdclark@chromium.org> Fixes: db735fc ("drm/msm: Set dma maximum segment size for mdss") Reviewed-by: Dmitry Baryshkov <dmitry.baryshkov@linaro.org> Patchwork: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/534892/ Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20230501204441.1642741-1-robdclark@gmail.com
Set platform name for dai links.
Signed-off-by: Ranjani Sridharan ranjani.sridharan@linux.intel.com