-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 349
Topology2: add missing topologies #10465
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Merged
Merged
Changes from all commits
Commits
File filter
Filter by extension
Conversations
Failed to load comments.
Loading
Jump to
Jump to file
Failed to load files.
Loading
Diff view
Diff view
There are no files selected for viewing
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
| Original file line number | Diff line number | Diff line change |
|---|---|---|
|
|
@@ -2,6 +2,15 @@ | |
|
|
||
| # Array of "input-file-name;output-file-name;comma separated pre-processor variables" | ||
| list(APPEND TPLGS | ||
| # MOCKUP topology for PTL | ||
|
Collaborator
There was a problem hiding this comment. Choose a reason for hiding this commentThe reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more. this would be for NVL, but not important, context makes obvious |
||
| "cavs-sdw\;sof-nvl-rt711-rt1308-rt715\;NUM_SDW_AMP_LINKS=2,SDW_DMIC=1,SDW_AMP_FEEDBACK=false" | ||
|
|
||
| "cavs-sdw\;sof-nvl-rt711-rt1308-mono-rt715\;NUM_SDW_AMP_LINKS=1,SDW_DMIC=1,SDW_AMP_FEEDBACK=false" | ||
|
|
||
| "cavs-sdw\;sof-nvl-rt715-rt711-rt1308-mono\;NUM_SDW_AMP_LINKS=1,SDW_DMIC=1,\ | ||
| SDW_JACK_OUT_STREAM=SDW1-Playback,SDW_JACK_IN_STREAM=SDW1-Capture,\ | ||
| SDW_SPK_STREAM=SDW2-Playback,SDW_DMIC_STREAM=SDW0-Capture,SDW_AMP_FEEDBACK=false,\ | ||
| SDW_SPK_ENHANCED_PLAYBACK=false,SDW_DMIC_ENHANCED_CAPTURE=false" | ||
|
|
||
| # RT721 eval board with PCH-DMIC, sof_sdw_quirk_table with SOC_SDW_PCH_DMIC | ||
| "cavs-sdw\;sof-nvl-rt721-4ch\;PLATFORM=nvl,SDW_DMIC=1,NUM_SDW_AMP_LINKS=1,NUM_DMICS=4,\ | ||
|
|
||
Oops, something went wrong.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
why are these mockup? Looks like actual codec topologies to me
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Because we reuse the file name in the mockup configs. Like
{ .link_mask = GENMASK(3, 0), .links = sdw_mockup_headset_2amps_mic, .drv_name = "sof_sdw", .sof_tplg_filename = "sof-ptl-rt711-rt1308-rt715.tplg", },https://github.com/thesofproject/linux/blob/topic/sof-dev/sound/soc/intel/common/soc-acpi-intel-ptl-match.c#L649
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Ahh yes. I forget this every single time.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
@bardliao I do wonder should we keep having the mocks for every gens going forward in upstream? Do these still serve a purpose in upstream?
Given these are upstream Linux, ok to add the topologies if only for consistency (topologies referenced by upstream Linux kernel should be available in SOF tplg upstream).