-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 349
topology: align core target for dmic16k to dmic01 #6916
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Closed
johnylin76
wants to merge
1
commit into
thesofproject:rpl-001-drop-stable
from
johnylin76:rpl-001-core-dmic16k
Closed
Changes from all commits
Commits
File filter
Filter by extension
Conversations
Failed to load comments.
Loading
Jump to
Jump to file
Failed to load files.
Loading
Diff view
Diff view
There are no files selected for viewing
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
well if you want to align, then the 48k pipeline needs to use core 0.
To optimize power consumption the dmic16k + WoV need to be on core0.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Thanks for the info @plbossart
Is it because core0 is reserved for WoV as default (which might be in different power state from other cores while suspended)?
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
core0 is on by default, and then other cores are turned on as needed which increases power consumption. So the recommended practice since forever is to place everything that needs to run in low-power use cases on core0, and use cores1..3 for processing, e.g. speaker protection and noise suppression on capture.
That said, it may be impossible at this point to move all the DMIC48k stuff to core0 if that core0 is already oversubscribed. that would mean different possible alternatives:
a) using your solution with an understanding that there's a power impact for WoV.
b) fixing the root cause and making sure the two paths can be used on different pipelines.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
So theoretically it should be fine for DMIC48K and DMIC16K running on the different core?
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I think it's expected in terms of architecture that DMIC16k stuff is on core0 and other DMIC48k stuff is on other cores, but between architecture and implementation we may have a gap. I don't know if the panic you're seeing is by design or really a bug.