-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 349
Audio: EQ-FIR: Optimize the eq_fir_2x_sx functions #7499
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Changes from all commits
File filter
Filter by extension
Conversations
Jump to
Diff view
Diff view
There are no files selected for viewing
| Original file line number | Diff line number | Diff line change |
|---|---|---|
|
|
@@ -44,7 +44,7 @@ | |
| #if XCHAL_HAVE_HIFI2EP == 1 | ||
| #define FIR_HIFIEP 1 | ||
| #define FIR_HIFI3 0 | ||
| #elif XCHAL_HAVE_HIFI3 == 1 | ||
| #elif XCHAL_HAVE_HIFI3 == 1 || XCHAL_HAVE_HIFI4 == 1 | ||
|
||
| #define FIR_HIFI3 1 | ||
| #define FIR_HIFIEP 0 | ||
| #else | ||
|
|
||
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I'm worrying about change of processing order. A run in real device with long FIR would give more confidence that this is better. Maybe also xt testbench could be enough because it has pipelines and scheduler framework from SOF. You could add a test response where left and right channel have different coefficients and make them long. See the FIR EQ examples generator how it's done.