[PTL STABLE] Tools: Topology2: Add topologies builds for PTL

[singalsu]

No description provided.

[singalsu]

Note: This needs an alsa-utils update that is not yet publicly available. I'm working on a cleaned-up version to be shared soon.

[marc-hb]

The two commits ending with 4658143 seem to have only topology changes (as expected).

Yet most compilation checks have C failures?!?

https://github.com/thesofproject/sof/actions/runs/9959983293/job/27518100450?pr=9306
https://github.com/thesofproject/sof/actions/runs/9959983307/job/27518099481?pr=9306

https://github.com/thesofproject/sof/actions/runs/9959983317/job/27518101723?pr=9306
Etc.

#9305 submitted around the same time is fine. Daily build is fine: https://github.com/thesofproject/sof/actions/runs/9948774464

Something somewhere went terribly wrong..

[marc-hb]

OK, I got it. Unlike #9305, this PR is not targeted at the main branch.

This gets me EVERY TIME!

EDIT: if the ptl-001-drop-stable branch is not temporary, please remove most .github/workflows/ from it.

[plbossart]

I don't think it makes sense to apply topology patches on what is essentially a curated firmware release. We might as well push all the topology changes to main, and do the work once.

[marc-hb]

Note: This needs an alsa-utils update that is not yet publicly available.

I don't think it makes sense to apply topology patches on what is essentially a curated firmware release. We might as well push all the topology changes to main, and do the work once.

Well, submitting to this branch achieves at least one thing: it publishes the changes without breaking the build on the main branch :-D

But yeah: the less branching always the better (branching is just duplication under source control) and this particular divergence does not seem solve any problem besides avoiding the alsa-utils upgrade for the main branch.

[singalsu]

@marc-hb @plbossart This PR needs a new version of alsa-utils, so the topologies build produces unusable ones for PTL ACE3.x until updated. The SSP configuration blob format is quite different now from previous platforms.

[ujfalusi]

@singalsu, can you include this as well to this PR:

From abcf1d6c9943181d7fb851741cee0799460fcc05 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Peter Ujfalusi <peter.ujfalusi@linux.intel.com>
Date: Thu, 18 Jul 2024 09:48:06 +0300
Subject: [PATCH] topology2: development: Add SSP nocodec topology for PTL

Generic SSP topology for PTL.

Signed-off-by: Peter Ujfalusi <peter.ujfalusi@linux.intel.com>
---
 tools/topology/topology2/development/tplg-targets.cmake | 4 ++++
 1 file changed, 4 insertions(+)

diff --git a/tools/topology/topology2/development/tplg-targets.cmake b/tools/topology/topology2/development/tplg-targets.cmake
index f4ad040136b5..2942940e57b5 100644
--- a/tools/topology/topology2/development/tplg-targets.cmake
+++ b/tools/topology/topology2/development/tplg-targets.cmake
@@ -55,6 +55,10 @@ NHLT_BIN=nhlt-sof-lnl-nocodec-fpga-4ch.bin,PASSTHROUGH=true,DMIC_IO_CLK=19200000
 
 "cavs-sdw\;sof-lnl-fpga-rt711-l0\;PLATFORM=lnl,NUM_HDMIS=0,PASSTHROUGH=true"
 
+# SSP topology for PTL
+"cavs-nocodec\;sof-ptl-nocodec\;PLATFORM=ptl,NUM_DMICS=4,PDM1_MIC_A_ENABLE=1,PDM1_MIC_B_ENABLE=1,\
+PREPROCESS_PLUGINS=nhlt,NHLT_BIN=nhlt-sof-ptl-nocodec.bin"
+
 # SSP topology for PTL FPGA with lower DMIC IO clock of 19.2MHz, 2ch PDM0 enabled
 "cavs-nocodec\;sof-ptl-nocodec-fpga-2ch-pdm0\;PLATFORM=ptl,NUM_DMICS=2,PREPROCESS_PLUGINS=nhlt,\
 NHLT_BIN=nhlt-sof-ptl-nocodec-fpga-2ch-pdm0.bin,PASSTHROUGH=true,DMIC_IO_CLK=19200000"
-- 
2.45.2

[lgirdwood]

@ranj063 @kv2019i psl review

[lgirdwood]

SOFCI TEST

[kv2019i]

@lgirdwood This is for ptl-001-drop-stable, so for @mwasko to approve. I think we should submit to mainline first if alsa-utils dependencies are met. @singalsu ?

[lgirdwood]

@lgirdwood This is for ptl-001-drop-stable, so for @mwasko to approve. I think we should submit to mainline first if alsa-utils dependencies are met. @singalsu ?

Ack - lets upstream in main.

[singalsu]

Closing