Skip to content

Update README.md#1774

Closed
zik6824 wants to merge 1 commit into
tinyhumansai:mainfrom
zik6824:patch-1
Closed

Update README.md#1774
zik6824 wants to merge 1 commit into
tinyhumansai:mainfrom
zik6824:patch-1

Conversation

@zik6824
Copy link
Copy Markdown

@zik6824 zik6824 commented May 15, 2026

Summary

  • What changed and why.
  • Keep this to 3-6 bullets focused on user-visible or architecture-impacting changes.

Problem

  • What issue or risk this PR addresses.
  • Include context needed for reviewers to evaluate correctness quickly.

Solution

  • How the implementation solves the problem.
  • Note important design decisions and tradeoffs.

Submission Checklist

If a section does not apply to this change, mark the item as N/A with a one-line reason. Do not delete items.

  • Tests added or updated (happy path + at least one failure / edge case) per Testing Strategy
  • Diff coverage ≥ 80% — changed lines (Vitest + cargo-llvm-cov merged via diff-cover) meet the gate enforced by .github/workflows/coverage.yml. Run pnpm test:coverage and pnpm test:rust locally; PRs below 80% on changed lines will not merge.
  • Coverage matrix updated — added/removed/renamed feature rows in docs/TEST-COVERAGE-MATRIX.md reflect this change (or N/A: behaviour-only change)
  • All affected feature IDs from the matrix are listed in the PR description under ## Related
  • No new external network dependencies introduced (mock backend used per Testing Strategy)
  • Manual smoke checklist updated if this touches release-cut surfaces (docs/RELEASE-MANUAL-SMOKE.md)
  • Linked issue closed via Closes #NNN in the ## Related section

Impact

  • Runtime/platform impact (desktop/mobile/web/CLI), if any.
  • Performance, security, migration, or compatibility implications.

Related

  • Closes:
  • Follow-up PR(s)/TODOs:

AI Authored PR Metadata (required for Codex/Linear PRs)

Keep this section for AI-authored PRs. For human-only PRs, mark each field N/A.

Linear Issue

  • Key:
  • URL:

Commit & Branch

  • Branch:
  • Commit SHA:

Validation Run

  • pnpm --filter openhuman-app format:check
  • pnpm typecheck
  • Focused tests:
  • Rust fmt/check (if changed):
  • Tauri fmt/check (if changed):

Validation Blocked

  • command:
  • error:
  • impact:

Behavior Changes

  • Intended behavior change:
  • User-visible effect:

Parity Contract

  • Legacy behavior preserved:
  • Guard/fallback/dispatch parity checks:

Duplicate / Superseded PR Handling

  • Duplicate PR(s):
  • Canonical PR:
  • Resolution (closed/superseded/updated):

Summary by CodeRabbit

  • Documentation
    • Streamlined README startup instructions for improved clarity. Users can now easily find directions to download from tinyhumans.ai/openhuman or run the installation commands.

Review Change Stack

@zik6824 zik6824 requested a review from a team May 15, 2026 00:39
@coderabbitai
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

coderabbitai Bot commented May 15, 2026

📝 Walkthrough

Walkthrough

A single line in README.md is updated: the "To install or get started…" instruction is replaced with a shorter "To get started…" line that directs users to tinyhumans.ai/openhuman or to run install commands.

Changes

README Documentation

Layer / File(s) Summary
Getting started instructions
README.md
The introductory "To install or get started" sentence is replaced with concise "To get started" text directing users to download from the website or run install commands.

Estimated code review effort

🎯 1 (Trivial) | ⏱️ ~2 minutes

Possibly related PRs

Poem

🐰 One line, one tweak, the startup gleams,
"Get started" now—no lengthy schemes,
The path is clear, the words ring true,
A rabbit's edit, tried and new! ✨

🚥 Pre-merge checks | ✅ 4 | ❌ 1

❌ Failed checks (1 inconclusive)

Check name Status Explanation Resolution
Title check ❓ Inconclusive The title 'Update README.md' is vague and does not convey the specific change made: updating startup instructions from 'To install or get started...' to 'To get started...' with new download/install guidance. Consider a more specific title such as 'Update README startup instructions' or 'Simplify README getting started section' to better communicate the actual change to reviewers.
✅ Passed checks (4 passed)
Check name Status Explanation
Docstring Coverage ✅ Passed No functions found in the changed files to evaluate docstring coverage. Skipping docstring coverage check.
Linked Issues check ✅ Passed Check skipped because no linked issues were found for this pull request.
Out of Scope Changes check ✅ Passed Check skipped because no linked issues were found for this pull request.
Description Check ✅ Passed Check skipped - CodeRabbit’s high-level summary is enabled.

✏️ Tip: You can configure your own custom pre-merge checks in the settings.

Tip

💬 Introducing Slack Agent: The best way for teams to turn conversations into code.

Slack Agent is built on CodeRabbit's deep understanding of your code, so your team can collaborate across the entire SDLC without losing context.

  • Generate code and open pull requests
  • Plan features and break down work
  • Investigate incidents and troubleshoot customer tickets together
  • Automate recurring tasks and respond to alerts with triggers
  • Summarize progress and report instantly

Built for teams:

  • Shared memory across your entire org—no repeating context
  • Per-thread sandboxes to safely plan and execute work
  • Governance built-in—scoped access, auditability, and budget controls

One agent for your entire SDLC. Right inside Slack.

👉 Get started


Thanks for using CodeRabbit! It's free for OSS, and your support helps us grow. If you like it, consider giving us a shout-out.

❤️ Share

Comment @coderabbitai help to get the list of available commands and usage tips.

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

@coderabbitai coderabbitai Bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Actionable comments posted: 1

🤖 Prompt for all review comments with AI agents
Verify each finding against current code. Fix only still-valid issues, skip the
rest with a brief reason, keep changes minimal, and validate.

Inline comments:
In `@README.md`:
- Line 33: The README line "To get started, download from
tinyhumans.ai/openhuman or run" is incomplete—replace that fragment with a full
sentence that tells users what to run or where to find the run command; for
example update the sentence to "To get started, download from
tinyhumans.ai/openhuman or run the quick-start installer/CLI as described in
tinyhumans.ai/openhuman/docs" so the fragment "To get started, download from
tinyhumans.ai/openhuman or run" is completed and points readers to the next
action or docs.
🪄 Autofix (Beta)

Fix all unresolved CodeRabbit comments on this PR:

  • Push a commit to this branch (recommended)
  • Create a new PR with the fixes

ℹ️ Review info
⚙️ Run configuration

Configuration used: Organization UI

Review profile: CHILL

Plan: Pro

Run ID: 88266333-71e1-48cd-b037-512580dab8e7

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between 3165306 and 6062af6.

📒 Files selected for processing (1)
  • README.md

Comment thread README.md
> **Early Beta**: Under active development. Expect rough edges.

To install or get started, either download from the website over at [tinyhumans.ai/openhuman](https://tinyhumans.ai/openhuman?utm_source=github&utm_medium=readme) or run
To get started, download from tinyhumans.ai/openhuman or run
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

⚠️ Potential issue | 🟡 Minor | ⚡ Quick win

Complete the getting-started sentence for clarity.

The sentence ends abruptly at “or run”, which makes the onboarding instruction feel broken.

✏️ Suggested wording
-To get started, download from tinyhumans.ai/openhuman or run
+To get started, download from https://tinyhumans.ai/openhuman or run the commands below:
📝 Committable suggestion

‼️ IMPORTANT
Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation. Thoroughly test & benchmark the code to ensure it meets the requirements.

Suggested change
To get started, download from tinyhumans.ai/openhuman or run
To get started, download from https://tinyhumans.ai/openhuman or run the commands below:
🤖 Prompt for AI Agents
Verify each finding against current code. Fix only still-valid issues, skip the
rest with a brief reason, keep changes minimal, and validate.

In `@README.md` at line 33, The README line "To get started, download from
tinyhumans.ai/openhuman or run" is incomplete—replace that fragment with a full
sentence that tells users what to run or where to find the run command; for
example update the sentence to "To get started, download from
tinyhumans.ai/openhuman or run the quick-start installer/CLI as described in
tinyhumans.ai/openhuman/docs" so the fragment "To get started, download from
tinyhumans.ai/openhuman or run" is completed and points readers to the next
action or docs.

@zik6824
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Author

zik6824 commented May 15, 2026

Minor copy edits — simplified phrasing to be more concise and straightforward.

1 similar comment
@zik6824
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Author

zik6824 commented May 15, 2026

Minor copy edits — simplified phrasing to be more concise and straightforward.

@zik6824 zik6824 closed this May 15, 2026
@zik6824 zik6824 reopened this May 15, 2026
@zik6824
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Author

zik6824 commented May 15, 2026

Minor copy edits — simplified phrasing to be more concise and straightforward.

@senamakel
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

no this is making the readme worse

@senamakel senamakel closed this May 15, 2026
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants