This repository was archived by the owner on Sep 20, 2018. It is now read-only.
Removed protection for cisphobic and racist individuals#83
Closed
Dinsmoor wants to merge 1 commit intotodogroup:gh-pagesfrom
Dinsmoor:patch-1
Closed
Removed protection for cisphobic and racist individuals#83Dinsmoor wants to merge 1 commit intotodogroup:gh-pagesfrom Dinsmoor:patch-1
Dinsmoor wants to merge 1 commit intotodogroup:gh-pagesfrom
Dinsmoor:patch-1
Conversation
There should be no difference in policy between 'marginalized' and 'privileged' individuals, because offering protection to one group and not another based on their gender, gender identity and expression, sexual orientation, disability, mental illness, neuro(a)typicality, physical appearance, body size, race, age, regional discrimination, political or religious affiliation is defined as harassment. There is no real way to determine whether someone is 'privileged' or not, and regardless should not be offered less protection because of it. Reverse racism exists as regular racism, and there should be no protection for racists just because they're being racist against a 'privileged' ethnic group. It's still racism and should not be tolerated.
Author
|
Pull request #70 would fix these issues. |
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to subscribe to this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in.
1 participant
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
There should be no difference in policy between 'marginalized' and 'privileged' individuals, because offering protection to one group and not another based on their gender, gender identity and expression, sexual orientation, disability, mental illness, neuro(a)typicality, physical appearance, body size, race, age, regional discrimination, political or religious affiliation is defined as harassment.
There is no real way to determine whether someone is 'privileged' or not, and regardless should not be offered less protection because of it.
Reverse racism exists as regular racism, and there should be no protection for racists just because they're being racist against a 'privileged' group. It's still racism and should not be tolerated.