Skip to content

docs: update cloud status#1877

Closed
efiop wants to merge 3 commits into
masterfrom
efiop-patch-1
Closed

docs: update cloud status#1877
efiop wants to merge 3 commits into
masterfrom
efiop-patch-1

Conversation

@efiop
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

@efiop efiop commented Oct 19, 2020

treeverse/dvc#4694

You may disregard these recommendations if you used the Edit on GitHub button from dvc.org to improve a doc in place.

❗ Please read the guidelines in the Contributing to the Documentation list if you make any substantial changes to the documentation or JS engine.

🐛 Please make sure to mention Fix #issue (if applicable) in the description of the PR. This causes GitHub to close it automatically when the PR is merged.

Please choose to allow us to edit your branch when creating the PR.

Thank you for the contribution - we'll try to review it as soon as possible. 🙏

@shcheklein shcheklein requested a deployment to dvc-landing-efiop-patch-bdrcyg October 19, 2020 17:43 Abandoned
@shcheklein shcheklein requested a deployment to dvc-landing-efiop-patch-bdrcyg October 19, 2020 17:47 Abandoned
Co-authored-by: Restyled.io <commits@restyled.io>
@shcheklein shcheklein temporarily deployed to dvc-landing-efiop-patch-bdrcyg October 19, 2020 17:48 Inactive
@shcheklein
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Merged the restyled version #1878

@shcheklein shcheklein closed this Oct 19, 2020
@efiop efiop deleted the efiop-patch-1 branch October 19, 2020 17:50
Comment on lines +46 to +47
`Data and pipelines are up to date.` or
`Cache and remote '{remote}' are in sync.` for `dvc status -c/-r`. If
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

@jorgeorpinel jorgeorpinel Oct 21, 2020

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I don't understand what happened since the blame doesn't even register this merge. But in any case, I further reviewed this and re-applied it in 246575a (part of #1881).

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants