cases: Fast and Secure Data Caching Hub

[jorgeorpinel]

Closes #654 (comment)
Closes #820 (last item)

• Consider comments from https://discuss.dvc.org/t/multiple-users-in-one-repo/746 (common file permission questions)

TODOs:

• Get concept and scope right
• Iterate on content
• Finalize name (see cases: Fast and Secure Data Caching Hub #2587 (comment))
• cases: update figures for Fast Data Access Layer #2677

[casperdcl]

Are we all agreed on the following?

• there are 2 categories of target audience. To catch both,
  1. title requires "Secure" or synonym
  2. title requires "Speed/Optimise" or synonym

Also IMHO this is not about SEO (whether it shows up in my search results). It is purely about being misleading (would I bother clicking on it assuming it was top of my search results).

[jorgeorpinel]

ii. title requires "Speed/Optimise" or synonym

I don't agree on this as a necessity. I think "Caching" implies speed.

[shcheklein]

let's not make it about models I think

this layer is important primarily to optimize datasets usage

[shcheklein]

minor: Hub - do we need this new term? I'm fine to keep it. just doesn't feel like it's needed

[shcheklein]

by using Secure exclusively we are overemphasizing it too much now ... it become specifically about "security" now

[shcheklein]

Caching Hub can be replaced with Cache I think?

[jorgeorpinel]

let's not make it about models

OK, removing "and Models".

Hub - do we need this new term?
Caching Hub can be replaced with Cache

Could be "Layer", or nothing. Layer could refer to the infrastructural aspect of this patter but it's not clear until you actually read the contents. What I like abut Hub is that a) some people may get that it's infrastructure-related (term taken from that recent SO question) and b) it implies multiple parties (people or projects in this case) can share a central cache.

by using Secure exclusively we are overemphasizing it too much now

Since "and Models" will be gone now, we can go back to "Fast and Secure" but fast has some misleading connotations (e.g. improving network throughput)... 🤔

[shcheklein]

Image feedback:

• border (you mentioned that are removing them - that's good)
• first image should trigger some pain , right not it's neutral - we don't see slow, we don't see the problem - can we emphasize that's slow
• style: smooth arrows heads/tails
• one barrel is enough? otherwise it's not clear if we have two different storages?

[jorgeorpinel]

Communicated with the designer. Will report back when we have updates ⏳

[iesahin]

After @shcheklein 's review, for the title: "Fast and Secure Data Cache"?

[jorgeorpinel]

Fast and Secure Data Cache

Fast could be misleading but I'm OK with that. I would still prefer "Caching Hub" though, as explained in #2587 (comment).

[shcheklein]

Caching Hub vs Cache

No strong opinion on this one - I see pros and cons for both, I think it's fine to go with Hub.

[jorgeorpinel]

UPDATE: FYI we're still finalizing the images but they're pretty close already. See https://dvc-org-cases-mgn-dsets-fbikyq.herokuapp.com/doc/use-cases/fast-data-caching-hub:

[jendefig]

UPDATE: FYI we're still finalizing the images but they're pretty close already. See https://dvc-org-cases-mgn-dsets-fbikyq.herokuapp.com/doc/use-cases/fast-data-caching-hub

There needs to be a party parrot/blob in Github. 😉

[jorgeorpinel]

I vote for a "run for your life Hollywood style" parrot

[jorgeorpinel]

So this was approved and the images have been worked on so I merged it! Please see the final result in https://dvc.org/doc/use-cases/fast-data-caching-hub and let me know if you have additional feedback. Thanks