Yaml with trees#4425
Merged
Merged
Conversation
ad59956 to
e30d0d9
Compare
2 tasks
Collaborator
Author
|
Tests failing because of some hdfs issue: Too much bad luck today with the tests, must be #4230. |
e30d0d9 to
bf107f9
Compare
* Also fixes plots not getting dumped on flow style * Make serialization utils aware of trees * Directly load yamls/tomls using utils, rather than using parser
bf107f9 to
0f452f0
Compare
pared
approved these changes
Aug 20, 2020
pmrowla
approved these changes
Aug 20, 2020
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Also fixes plots not getting dumped on flow style
Make serialization utils aware of trees
Directly load yamls/tomls using utils, rather than using parser
❗ I have followed the Contributing to DVC checklist.
📖 If this PR requires documentation updates, I have created a separate PR (or issue, at least) in dvc.org and linked it here.
Thank you for the contribution - we'll try to review it as soon as possible. 🙏
On top of #4415, see #4415 (comment)