Keep status output format consistents#4490
Conversation
fix#4482 According to the discussion. Make `DVC status [outputs]` output format the same with `DVC status [stages]` instead of `DVC status -c [outputs]`
skshetry
left a comment
There was a problem hiding this comment.
@karajan1001, I understand that the output format is not good. I find it quite ugly too (what's with the indent, right? 😄 ). If you have a good output format, please do suggest.
I have no issues with the previous output format, I only wanted the dvc's internals to be consistent, as it could affect other --show-json functionalities. 🙂
@karajan1001, Thanks for the contributions. 🎉
|
Maybe we should go with git-like status: cc @karajan1001 |
@skshetry |
|
Thank you @karajan1001 ! 🙏 |
|
Hi there! This PR probably implies several changes to the sample outputs of |
|
@jorgeorpinel, this does not change any output formats at all. Let's say you have a stage, "stage1" with outputs "out1" and "out2". So, if you do $ dvc status stage1
stage1:
changed outs:
deleted: out1
deleted: out2And, if you just do $ dvc status out1
stage1:
changed outs:
deleted: out1This PR just rollbacked a different output format that was temporarily there. |
|
Okay, well I noticed we have some really outdated status outputs in docs thanks to this issue. We'll address that separately, then. Thanks |
fix #4482
According to the discussion. Make
DVC status [outputs]output format the same withDVC status [stages]instead ofDVC status -c [outputs]❗ I have followed the Contributing to DVC checklist.
📖 If this PR requires documentation updates, I have created a separate PR (or issue, at least) in dvc.org and linked it here.
Thank you for the contribution - we'll try to review it as soon as possible. 🙏