Problem: PR types are not clear

[zolotokrylin]

chore is the same as refactor -> feel free to use refactor
Pretty sure that's not true, again I've never seen chore used to refer to anything other than build process changes (and also your screenshot doesn't include the "chore" type 😅)
Can you link me to the definition of the types we're using?

Originally posted by @Dev-Doggo in https://github.com/truflation/truf-claim-page/issues/339#issuecomment-2165278441

[zolotokrylin]

@Dev-Doggo https://stackoverflow.com/questions/26944762/when-to-use-chore-as-type-of-commit-message

"grunt task" means nothing that an external user would see:

- implementation (of an existing feature, which doesn't involve a fix),
- configuration (like the .gitignore or .gitattributes),
- private internal methods...

source: https://stackoverflow.com/questions/26944762/when-to-use-chore-as-type-of-commit-message

I agree it is not clear. I always used chore as refactoring, build related to build and preprocessing. Thus chore is similar to build and similar to refactor.

Let's get rid of chore.