Fix delegated event handler registration/removal#24487
Closed
alekitto wants to merge 0 commit intotwbs:v4-without-jqueryfrom
Closed
Fix delegated event handler registration/removal#24487alekitto wants to merge 0 commit intotwbs:v4-without-jqueryfrom
alekitto wants to merge 0 commit intotwbs:v4-without-jqueryfrom
Conversation
Member
|
For a moment there I was like, "wtf, how did our JS grow up so much in a PR?" Then I noticed this PR targets the no jquery branch :) |
Member
Member
|
Can you update your branch @alekitto please ? |
Johann-S
force-pushed
the
v4-without-jquery
branch
from
b8c6d85 to
75f90ee
Compare
Member
|
I added your commit to |
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
3 participants
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Registering the same event handler for different delegated selectors was impossible due to a bug in the event handler
addHandlerfunction. Now is correctly handled.See #24099 (comment)