Reword the rules about symbol files#605
Open
pushkarnk wants to merge 2 commits into
Open
Conversation
pushkarnk
requested review from
MylesJP,
cpaelzer,
didrocks,
joalif and
setharnold
as code owners
The rules in the context of the absence of a symbol files need to be reworded because for debhelper_compat >= 12, dh_makeshlibs and dh_makeshlibs -V (with an empty argument) impose the same constraint using 'Upstream-Version'.
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
1 participant
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Description
The rules in the context of the absence of a symbol files need to be reworded because for debhelper_compat >= 12, dh_makeshlibs and dh_makeshlibs -V (with an empty argument) impose the same constraint using 'Upstream-Version'.
Related issue
dh_makeshlibs -Vrule #491Checklist