Convert model initialisation routines to python

[timothy-nunn]

Converts module initialisation (setting of initial defaults) to Python.

In some cases, there was not an obvious places for these functions to live and so I just added to the file that seemed to use the variables the most.

See comment below for the annoying reason there are some slight test changes despite this being a line-for-line port of the code from Fortran to Python.

[codecov-commenter]

Codecov Report

✅ All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests.
✅ Project coverage is 36.54%. Comparing base (f55aca5) to head (baf8548).
⚠️ Report is 436 commits behind head on main.

Additional details and impacted files

@@            Coverage Diff             @@
##             main    #3586      +/-   ##
==========================================
+ Coverage   31.01%   36.54%   +5.53%     
==========================================
  Files          87       87              
  Lines       20412    22190    +1778     
==========================================
+ Hits         6330     8110    +1780     
+ Misses      14082    14080       -2     

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

🚀 New features to boost your workflow:

• ❄️ Test Analytics: Detect flaky tests, report on failures, and find test suite problems.

[timothy-nunn]

Errors in the TF coil are being caused by setting

tfv.poisson_cond_axial = 0.3
tfv.poisson_cond_trans = 0.3

The reason
In Fortran, the variables were set like

PROCESS/source/fortran/tfcoil_variables.f90

Lines 929 to 930 in cb982be

	poisson_cond_axial = 0.3
	poisson_cond_trans = 0.3

If you look around, every other float variable being assigned is followed by a D0 which explicitly sets the value to double precision. Therefore, in the Fortran these variables were being initialised to single precision 0.3 (still being assigned to a double precision variable however). When we set 0.3 across the Python-Fortran interface, it does it to double precision not single precision.

To verify, I changed the Fortran code to

poisson_cond_axial = 0.3D0
poisson_cond_trans = 0.3D0

and the same errors (differences) occur as in the Python case.

[jonmaddock]

Great stuff, just need to resolve conflicts then go for it!

[timothy-nunn]

A similar issue to above is occurring at:

PROCESS/source/fortran/pfcoil_variables.f90

Line 521 in f55aca5

ld_ratio_cst = 70/22

When I calculate 70/22 in Fortran and assign it to the ld_ratio_cst the large Tokamak once through test stops failing